Latest headlines warning of considerations akin to coronary heart dangers or hazard to youngsters have put a brand new highlight on a food regimen development that has lengthy been the favored epitome of a wholesome way of life: intermittent fasting. “Intermittent fasting’s picture has been deeply tarnished—and fairly rightly so,” says Stefan Kabisch, a doctor on the endocrinology and metabolic drugs division at Charité–College Drugs Berlin. “The hype was by no means actually backed up by good information in people.”
Advocates have claimed that quickly abstaining from meals for lengthy stretches of the day can enhance well being and longevity. In the commonest fasting schedule, individuals don’t eat for 16 hours—typically skipping breakfast or dinner—and make up for it within the remaining eight hours (the so-called 16:8 technique). Some individuals might severely restrict meals consumption each different day (alternate-day fasting) or take a fasting day twice every week (the 5:2 technique).
The results of such practices might be tough to review. “The primary downside with randomized managed trials on intermittent fasting is that there are such a lot of variations,” Kabisch explains. “The information is due to this fact very heterogeneous, which makes it tough to evaluate results.”
On supporting science journalism
In the event you’re having fun with this text, think about supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By buying a subscription you might be serving to to make sure the way forward for impactful tales in regards to the discoveries and concepts shaping our world as we speak.
Why Take Lengthy Breaks from Consuming?
Trendy society has given option to existence that encourage overeating, says Tinh-Hai Collet, a diabetologist and a professor on the Geneva College Hospitals. “This promotes weight problems and diabetes.” Consultants have known as diabetes a worldwide epidemic. Roughly 590 million individuals worldwide have diabetes, based on the most recent 2025 studies from the Worldwide Diabetes Federation—and greater than 90 % of them have sort 2, typically known as adult-onset diabetes.
One of many fundamental points in sort 2 diabetes is that those that are affected take up extra power than they use. An indicator of the illness is insulin resistance, during which cells now not successfully reply to the hormone insulin. This implies cells absorb much less sugar from the blood, and blood sugar ranges rise. “Intermittent fasting nearly at all times improves the cells’ response to insulin,” says Stephan Herzig, a professor on the Technical College of Munich and head of the Helmholtz Diabetes Heart at Helmholtz Munich. “In consequence, the concentrations of sugar, fat and ldl cholesterol within the blood additionally fall.” A 2023 examine, led by Mark Ezpeleta of the College of Illinois Chicago, means that alternate-day fasting—particularly when mixed with train—additionally mitigates fatty liver illness, during which fats builds up on within the liver, unrelated to alcohol consumption.
A more in-depth take a look at the analysis, nonetheless, reveals such statements is probably not as clear-cut as they’re typically introduced to be. For instance, the researchers on the 2023 liver fats examine in contrast volunteer teams that underwent totally different consuming and train schedules: alternating days between a decreased calorie consumption and an unrestricted food regimen; solely finishing an train program; combining the fasting schedule with exercising; or not present process any intervention. The group that fasted and exercised on the similar time noticed the perfect outcomes. But there was no comparability group during which individuals didn’t alternate days however nonetheless had the identical calorie consumption because the fasting contributors. “That is an unfair comparability,” Kabisch says. And related gaps in examine design “run via all the literature on the topic.”
Two meta-analyses of individuals with diabetes or weight problems concluded that intermittent fasting had a optimistic impact on weight, blood sugar, blood stress and blood lipids (triglycerides). “In a lot of the underlying main research, nonetheless, the fasting topics had been in contrast with individuals who didn’t change their food regimen,” Kabisch says. In consequence, the themes within the intervention teams misplaced weight—however, logically, the management teams didn’t, as a result of the researchers didn’t apply any calorie restrictions. “You solely see robust results of intermittent fasting in comparison with individuals who weren’t given any food regimen or train tips,” Kabisch explains. “However as quickly as you evaluate it with equal calorie discount, the advantages of intermittent fasting disappear.”
And the supposed enchancment in insulin resistance can be not at all times demonstrable. In one other meta-analysis, no results had been discovered on this regard. In different research, the enhancements had been small.
As Good as Different Diets for Shedding Weight
The confirmed advantages of momentary fasting seem like that individuals eat much less and drop some weight in consequence. Scientists on the College of Tub in England examined this explicitly in 2021: they in contrast intermittent fasting with a food regimen that had no time restrictions however the identical calorie quantity. And lo and behold, there was no benefit to fasting by way of weight or varied blood measurements. Belly fats truly melted away extra in steady eaters. “This examine has a very good design for evaluating intermittent fasting as compared,” Kabisch says. “The discovering that [intermittent fasting] shouldn’t be a superior technique for weight reduction is in line with outcomes from different research.”
“The longer-term research confirmed that the optimistic results of intermittent fasting usually are not considerably totally different from these you’d have in case you merely ate fewer energy every single day,” Herzig provides.
Many individuals discover it simpler to skip a meal than to eat much less at each—however consuming behaviors and weight tendencies fluctuate drastically amongst people. “It’s fairly potential that some individuals reward themselves with notably high-calorie meals after fasting phases and don’t considerably scale back their total power consumption in consequence,” Herzig says.
As well as, proof suggests intermittent fasting makes you hungrier than steady calorie restriction. A meta-analysis on fasting throughout Ramadan (a holy month of the Islamic calendar when individuals don’t eat between dawn and sundown) supported this discovering with a blood evaluation: the focus of the hormone ghrelin, which triggers starvation, was considerably larger within the individuals who fasted.
Ramadan presents a common, tried-and-tested pure experiment in momentary abstinence from meals, and researchers have drawn one necessary conclusion from associated research: intermittent fasting might pose a major danger for individuals with sort 2 diabetes—a bunch that ought to notably profit from it, based on standard literature. For instance, in a 2023 examine of assorted Arab nations, a 3rd of contributors had elevated glucose ranges throughout Ramadan fasting in contrast with the interval earlier than the month began. “We see a major deterioration in blood sugar ranges in diabetics throughout Ramadan,” Kabisch says. “Nonetheless, that is additionally attributable to the truth that very sweetened meals are sometimes eaten at evening.”
“Fasting is certainly dangerous at an older age as a result of it alerts the physique to interrupt down muscle mass.” —Eline Slagboom, epidemiologist
In 2020 a poster by researchers at Shanghai Jiao Tong College Faculty of Drugs in China and their colleagues made headlines when it was introduced at an American Coronary heart Affiliation convention in Chicago. (The analysis has not but appeared in a peer-reviewed journal.) In it, the scientists postulated an elevated danger of loss of life in individuals who fasted intermittently. They referred to twenty,000 individuals within the U.S. who took half within the Nationwide Well being and Diet Examination Surveys (NHANES) between 2003 and 2018. On common, the contributors had been noticed for eight years. It was discovered that individuals who took at the least 16-hour breaks from consuming had been nearly twice as prone to die from a cardiovascular occasion (primarily coronary heart assault or stroke) than those that ate extra typically. The examine has obtained a whole lot of criticism, nonetheless, partly as a result of its design can not show causation. And it’s also potential, for instance, that individuals who had been already unwell abstained from meals to be able to drop some weight; this group’s mortality would then be larger due to underlying ailments, akin to diabetes and morbid weight problems—not due to breaks in consuming.
However these outcomes have made proponents of the food regimen development extra cautious. “Till not too long ago, short-term research all confirmed optimistic results of intermittent fasting,” Herzig says. “Now there are an increasing number of long-term observations with preliminary indications that it may even have damaging results, particularly on heart problems.”
Higher To not Skip Breakfast
One other meta-analysis, masking greater than 200,000 contributors from Japan and the U.S., examined the extent to which skipping breakfast affected well being. Over a 17-year statement interval, the danger of heart problems was 21 % larger in individuals who usually didn’t eat breakfast than in individuals who ate frequently within the morning. In different research, those that principally skipped breakfast confirmed an elevated danger of weight problems (48 %) and sort 2 diabetes (between 12 and 21 %) and a better mortality charge from cardiovascular ailments or most cancers.
Kabisch cautions in opposition to extrapolating an excessive amount of from the findings. “These are epidemiological research that don’t show causality,” he factors out. “Distortions are probably as a result of skipping breakfast is usually related to poverty, smoking, alcohol consumption, poor-quality vitamin and lack of train.”
As well as, dietary patterns had been typically solely surveyed selectively—for instance, for the final day, the final week or the previous few months earlier than the examine—and had been due to this fact not essentially consultant. However, these research don’t present good arguments that intermittent fasting may benefit well being.
Muscle Mass Decreases
It’s typically solely in research’ high-quality print that one specific darkish aspect of the intermittent fasting development is acknowledged: considerations about muscle mass loss. This was the case in a 2025 examine. Based on the authors, co-led by Manuel Dote-Montero and Antonio Clavero-Jimeno, each on the Sport and Well being College Analysis Institute in Spain, intermittent fasting presents no benefit over a Mediterranean food regimen by way of belly fats loss, whatever the time window of the fasting interval. One graph confirmed that those that fasted misplaced muscle mass—however this was not the case for individuals who ate the identical variety of energy all through the day. The identical sample might be present in a meta-analysis of the results of various types of interval fasting: the examine contributors’ fat-free mass (their muscle mass) decreased all over the place.
“Our physique makes use of 20 to 40 grams of protein per meal,” Kabisch explains. “However an grownup wants 70 to 90 grams per day. So in case you pack all the quantity into two or perhaps a single meal, you may simply slip right into a protein deficiency.” In some instances, this even ends in no weight reduction throughout intermittent fasting, and as an alternative to muscle loss and fats buildup.
“Fasting is certainly dangerous at an older age as a result of it offers the physique the sign to interrupt down muscle,” says Eline Slagboom, a professor of epidemiology who is concentrated on getting old analysis at Leiden College within the Netherlands. “That’s the very last thing you want if you wish to keep match and unbiased in outdated age.”
Kabisch usually advises in opposition to intermittent fasting for individuals older than age 50.
“In the event you’re wholesome, you gained’t profit from intermittent fasting—you may’t enhance a super metabolism.” —Tinh-Hai Collet, diabetologist
Individuals with preexisting situations must also watch out. “Diabetes sufferers, for instance, have to regulate the dosage and timing of their medicine,” Collet says. “They need to solely apply intermittent fasting in session with a physician.” The identical applies to those that take medicine for hypertension as a result of breaks between meals may decrease blood stress.
“Individuals with consuming issues and most cancers must also undoubtedly keep away from intermittent fasting,” Collet advises. Individuals with tumors typically lose a whole lot of weight, which worsens their prognosis; any meals restriction can exacerbate this impact. The German Coronary heart Basis advises in opposition to fasting altogether within the case of pronounced cardiac insufficiency. Individuals with different coronary heart situations who need to drop some weight ought to purpose to cut back their calorie consumption by a most of 500 to 800 kilocalories.
Consultants say that it’s solely advisable for wholesome individuals as much as center age to attempt intermittent fasting to drop some weight. “Nonetheless, the optimistic results solely final so long as you retain up the consuming breaks,” Herzig says. Intermittent fasting is in no way a assure of a wholesome life.
“A balanced food regimen and loads of train are necessary,” Collet says. “However in case you’re wholesome, you gained’t profit from intermittent fasting—you may’t enhance your metabolism.”
This text initially appeared in Spektrum der Wissenschaft and was reproduced with permission.
