It’s been a woefully unpredictable yr for sequels at Blumhouse. “M3GAN 2.0” was tonally baffling and financially disastrous. “The Black Cellphone 2” was a daring creative imaginative and prescient that also divides critics and audiences months later. Now, “5 Nights at Freddy’s 2″ is surpassing field workplace projections by giving followers precisely what they anticipated, for higher or worse. That’s motive sufficient for style regulars to resume their religion within the horror studio and argument for Blumhouse to maintain treating franchises extra like consolation meals going ahead.
Regardless of some scathing evaluations on Rotten Tomatoes — the place returning director Emma Tammi’s follow-up movie at present holds a 15 p.c with critics however ranks 88 p.c amongst customers — “5 Nights at Freddy’s 2” simply had a $109 million world opening. Like the primary movie from 2023, the sequel adapts the megapopular online game collection created by Scott Cawthon, who got here again to put in writing this script solo.
Incomes a “C-” from IndieWire, the brand new film was lambasted by cinephiles as illogical, messy, and full of cliches. After all, die-hard “Freddy’s” followers ate it up simply the identical. That viewers doesn’t come to the theater for status swings. They arrive for lore drops, leap scares, inside jokes, and memeable moments with bulbous animatronics. Blumhouse delivered that unapologetically, and ended its yr of shaky experiments with a correct occasion that would assist drive future sequels towards larger success.
“M3GAN 2.0” Swung Huge and Flopped in Each Means
Combining camp, horror, and satire, the unique “M3GAN” was a sensation in 2023 as a result of it felt uniquely attuned to that second. “M3GAN 2.0” veered off that path spectacularly — ditching the high-tech killer-doll carnage that made the primary film really feel like a feverishly up to date “Youngster’s Play” for a sequel that was firmly rooted in sci-fi motion territory. Critics panned its tone, followers felt alienated, and ticket gross sales shortly mirrored that disconnect. The film barely made it to a world complete of $39 million in comparison with the $180 million earned by Blumhouse’s earlier juggernaut.
Founder and CEO Jason Blum addressed the studio’s failure publicly again then. On an episode of The City podcast, he mentioned the crew “over-thought all the things,” assuming the pint-sized character was so iconic she may survive a drastic style shift. She couldn’t. In making an attempt to make M3GAN a snarky superhero as an alternative of a slasher villain, the sequel deserted the precise tone and vitality that made her go viral within the first place. Blumhouse swung for reinvention when audiences wished repetition, and the outcome was a sequel that failed on each entrance — spurring “M3GAN” supporters to query if the studio understood the IP it spent oceans of cash producing and selling in any respect.
“The Black Cellphone 2” Did Effectively Financially, however Divided Opinion
“The Black Cellphone 2” was Blumhouse’s brightest spot all yr. It didn’t fairly out-perform the unique movie from 2021 however it efficiently increasing past the novel that film was primarily based on (with the assistance of writer Joe Hill) and earned practically $132 million worldwide. Followers of the primary launch confirmed up in droves past opening weekend, and lots of critics praised filmmaker Scott Derrickson for his sequel’s stunning emotional depth. However “Black Cellphone 2” additionally break up the franchise’s base with the shift from serial killer horror towards supernatural terror rubbing purists the improper method.
Horror franchises have survived and even thrived due to huge pivots like that earlier than; see “Evil Useless II” and “Wes Craven’s New Nightmare,” for starters. However they’ve additionally crashed spectacularly; see “M3GAN 2.0” “Black Cellphone 2” landed someplace within the center. It was admired by some, tolerated by others, and reviled by those that both didn’t just like the collection to start with — or didn’t need Derrickson turning Ethan Hawke’s dramatically grounded portrayal of The Grabber right into a “Nightmare on Elm Avenue” ripoff.
Derrickson and co-writer C. Robert Cargill have mentioned they received’t make a 3rd movie except they’ve an concept that genuinely conjures up them, with Cargill noting “The Black Cellphone 3” would solely work if the pair may justify “placing a yr of our life” into that hypothetical script (through Polygon). That’s a tall order after increasing a literary world as soon as, however doing it twice with out baiting disaster is exponentially tougher. “Black Cellphone 2” didn’t flop by any means, however it additionally didn’t give the franchise the frictionless momentum a horror world must change into a decades-spanning establishment on the films.
“5 Nights at Freddy’s 2” Set and Met All Expectations
With “5 Nights at Freddy’s 2,” Tammi and Cawthon didn’t reinvent a lot of something — they didn’t must. Utilizing the identical core solid and mimicking numerous narrative beats from the primary movie, the sequel recycles its paint-by-numbers system to strengthen the identification the “Freddy’s” constructed its neighborhood round final time. With a tone that oscillates between honest makes an attempt at horror filmmaking, and spoofable web tradition that hardly appears like its making an attempt, the outcome actually works for many who wished it.
That predictability turned “5 Nights at Freddy’s 2” into a world occasion able to supporting pricy popcorn buckets and costumed screenings. Followers confirmed up much less thinking about choosing aside the intricacies of artwork and extra like they had been watching a beloved sports activities enter a brand new season. The franchise already has its playbook, and judging by social media reactions, Blumhouse ran it with out improvising for the win. Horror mainstays have accomplished that endlessly with classics like “Friday the thirteenth,” “Halloween,” and “Scream” taking their very own detours however in the end coming to dwell and die by the ritual in fashionable media.
There’s no query “Black Cellphone 2” is an all-around higher, greater high quality film than “5 Nights at Freddy’s 2,” however judging by its cliffhanger ending, Cawthon and Tammi’s sequel has a stronger shot at becoming a member of the ranks of franchises with actual longevity. The movie didn’t aspire to status or shock worth, as an alternative giving its gamer fanbase the replayable expertise they anticipated. That’s why it labored.
For Blumhouse Sequels, Predictability > Status
With “5 Nights at Freddy’s 3” already constructing buzz, and tasks like “Ma 2” in growth, Blumhouse has a option to make after the reception rollercoaster that was its 2025. Does the studio preserve chasing prestige-pivot sequels that would attract contemporary audiences but additionally threat pushing away outdated followers? Or does it embrace the mannequin that has outlined the studio from the start: low-risk, high-return horror movies that know precisely who they’re for — even when they don’t please everybody?
In an more and more claustrophobic and draining creative house, the way forward for the studio’s picture may hinge on leaning into predictability, not as a artistic cop-out however as a model identification you’ll be able to belief while you purchase a ticket. Followers of those franchises don’t all the time crave novelty; they’ve acquired A24, Neon, Shudder, and extra audacious style opponents for unique tales like that. No, they arrive to Blumhouse for formulation executed with confidence, and so they’ll preserve doing that as long as the studio respects that compact.
“5 Nights at Freddy’s 2” is in theaters now.
