Within the years earlier than Rob and Michele Reiner had been killed, Los Angeles police made no less than two visits to their house in Brentwood.
On Feb. 25, 2019, officers performed a welfare examine after somebody referred to as 911 at 9:51 p.m. In line with LAPD information reviewed by The Instances, officers arrived on the tackle at 10:12 p.m., accomplished the decision and reported the incident to an unidentified supervisor.
Then on Sept. 27, 2019, police responded at 4:24 p.m. to a psychological well being–associated name for service involving an unidentified man. Officers later knowledgeable a supervisor that they discovered “no indication of psychological sickness,” based on division information.
The calls had been pretty innocuous and usually wouldn’t elevate eyebrows.
However authorities now allege the couple’s son, who lived within the guesthouse on their property, fatally stabbed them of their master suite final month.
The psychological state of Nick Reiner, who struggled for years with substance abuse and had been prescribed a schizophrenia drug, has now taken middle stage in his authorized battle.
Prosecutors haven’t detailed their case, and Reiner’s authorized staff has not supplied his personal story. It’s nonetheless attainable his protection might current compelling proof that Nick Reiner didn’t commit the killings. But when the case is robust, the trial might revolve round Reiner’s psychological state and the size of sentence.
Prosecutors charged Nick Reiner, 32, with two counts of first-degree homicide with particular circumstances for the killings within the early hours of Dec. 14. Authorities haven’t supplied a attainable motive within the case.
Reiner is again in courtroom Wednesday and is not thought of to be a suicide threat. He has not but entered a plea.
Authorized specialists say Reiner’s legal professional, Alan Jackson, is probably going now working to judge his shopper’s historical past of psychological well being and mind-set on the time of the crime. These findings may very well be the premise for discussions of a plea deal or the start of an madness protection, attorneys say.
There are additionally different defenses that Jackson might pursue based mostly on his psychological historical past and attainable modifications in his treatment and different elements which may not have been made public but, together with what might need triggered the killings, mentioned Laurie Levenson, professor of legislation at Loyola Legislation College and a former federal prosecutor.
“There’s quite a bit nonetheless to be executed to work this case up,” Levenson mentioned. “He can both attempt to go for a not responsible by cause of madness, or he might need testimony that he wasn’t in a position to type the psychological state for the crime due to his treatment and his prior psychological background.”
If his protection can show that Reiner couldn’t type the “intent to kill due to what’s occurring along with his treatment or along with his illness” then it may very well be a technique to get a lesser cost similar to second-degree homicide, Levenson mentioned. With first-degree homicide costs, prosecutors should present that the accused acted with premeditation or malice.
“It’s simply manner too early to say that that is an all or nothing case — that he’s going to be discovered responsible of homicide one or discovered not responsible. There are prone to be different choices,” Levenson mentioned.
If convicted of first-degree homicide, Reiner is going through attainable life in jail with out the potential for parole or the demise penalty. Prosecutors haven’t decided about whether or not they’ll search capital punishment within the case.
If Reiner is discovered not responsible by cause of madness then he would probably be dedicated to a psychological well being facility. And he would possibly in some unspecified time in the future be capable of present that his situation has improved and have outpatient standing or be launched, Levenson mentioned.
Saul Faerstein, a medical and forensic psychiatrist and professor of psychiatry at UCLA, mentioned docs will probably attempt to piece collectively the times main as much as the killings to find out what sort of psychological state Reiner was in on the time.
“We’d need to know what was occurring on Friday or Saturday. Was he starting to decompensate? Was he appearing out of character? Was he doing and saying issues that shocked individuals or frightened individuals? Was he saying issues that made no sense?” Faerstein mentioned.
Reiner’s capability to examine right into a resort and journey throughout Los Angeles the place he was seen at a gasoline station and finally arrested isn’t essentially an indication that he was of sound thoughts, Faerstein mentioned.
“These issues don’t require quite a lot of cognitive perform, and they are often executed even in a delusional state,” he mentioned.
There have been a number of examples of instances in California during which costs have been diminished due to psychological well being elements.
In 2023, Bryn Spejcher was convicted of involuntary manslaughter for killing Chad O’Melia, a person she’d been relationship, with kitchen knives inside his house in Thousand Oaks. They’d been smoking marijuana out of O’Melia’s bong, which precipitated Spejcher to undergo from cannabis-induced psychosis.
The Ventura County District Legal professional’s Workplace had initially filed a homicide cost towards her, however diminished the cost to involuntary manslaughter after the prosecution’s specialists agreed that she was in a psychotic state introduced on by the marijuana intoxication. Prosecutors couldn’t show malice within the case.
Spejcher was sentenced to probation and group service. She’s within the technique of interesting her conviction, courtroom information present.
Michael Goldstein, a Los Angeles protection legal professional who represented Spejcher, mentioned that if Reiner attorneys can doc a historical past of psychological well being points, it might assist his probabilities.
“Primarily based on info which have been revealed publicly, [not guilty by reason of insanity] seems to be a viable protection,” Goldstein mentioned. “If profitable, that may end in long-term hospitalization. It’s nonetheless early within the course of and Mr. Jackson made it clear there are important points being explored. Time will inform.”
In a case in 2010, Jennifer Lynn Bigham was discovered not responsible of homicide and baby abuse by cause of madness after authorities mentioned she drowned her 3-year-old daughter in a tub at a relative’s house within the Central Valley.
Docs had decided Bigham was affected by extreme psychological sickness on the time of her daughter’s demise. After roughly three years of therapy in 2013, a choose ordered her to be launched from custody as a result of docs mentioned she was not insane.
It’s attainable, Levenson mentioned, that the protection will be capable of current compelling proof of psychological dysfunction to prosecutors to resolve the case earlier than trial. It’s additionally attainable the case will go to trial and he may very well be discovered not responsible by cause of madness and dedicated versus serving jail time.
Even when he’s dedicated, sooner or later any problems he’s recognized with may very well be handled and he may very well be launched, Levenson mentioned.
Although madness defenses in lots of instances will not be profitable, based mostly on the info identified on the time, this case may very well be an exception, specialists say.
“It’s a reasonably traditional of a state of affairs the place you could have what appears to be like like a extremely horrific, perhaps premeditated homicide, and then you definately begin studying extra about his background, that it doesn’t seem like he’s making this up, that there appears to be some medical historical past of this, the change in treatment, and unexpectedly you say, ‘Wow, this is perhaps that uncommon case the place psychological protection, or an madness protection, will succeed,” Levenson mentioned.
