Greenland’s authorities and prime minister issued separate statements on Monday pushing again in opposition to U.S. President Donald Trump’s newest feedback about taking up the territory, which Trump has mentioned will occur “a method or one other.”
The Greenlandic authorities assertion mentioned it “can not settle for” the escalating U.S. rhetoric “in any method” and reaffirmed its place as each part of Denmark and the NATO army alliance.
“As a part of the Danish Commonwealth, Greenland is a member of NATO and the defence of Greenland should subsequently be by means of NATO,” the federal government assertion mentioned.
“The federal government coalition in Greenland believes that Greenland will without end be a part of the Western defence alliance.”
In a Fb put up, Greenland Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen acknowledged the “worldwide consideration” on the territory’s future mirrored its “strategic significance” for Arctic safety.
But he underscored that discussions about strengthening Greenland’s defences should be held in “shut cooperation” with all NATO allies, “together with america and in cooperation with Denmark.”
“We’re a democratic society that makes our personal choices,” Nielsen wrote. “And our actions are primarily based on worldwide regulation and customary regulation.”
The prime minister added it’s a “basic and agency line” that Greenland’s “safety and defence belong inside NATO.”
The statements got here after Trump as soon as once more reiterated his argument that the U.S. must “take Greenland” whereas talking to reporters aboard Air Drive One on Sunday.
“In some way, we’re going to have Greenland,” Trump mentioned, arguing a U.S. takeover would stop Russia or China from doing the identical factor.
White Home press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Monday mentioned Trump has not set a timeline for buying Greenland however added it’s a “precedence for him.”
Get breaking Nationwide information
For information impacting Canada and world wide, join breaking information alerts delivered on to you after they occur.
“Let’s not overlook, it might not simply be in the perfect curiosity of america, however maybe it might be in the perfect curiosity of Greenland as effectively to be a part of america and guarded by america,” she informed reporters.
There’s already an American army presence in Greenland below a 1951 treaty that additionally permits the U.S. to broaden its bases within the territory because it sees match. U.S. army operations in Greenland are a part of collective NATO defences within the Arctic.
Trump mentioned Friday that the U.S. would purchase Greenland “whether or not they prefer it or not,” and that “if we don’t do it the simple method, we’re going to do it the onerous method,” showing to allude to potential army motion.
Nielsen and Greenland’s get together leaders responded with a joint assertion saying the territory’s future should be determined by its individuals.
“We don’t wish to be Individuals, we don’t wish to be Danes, we wish to be Greenlanders,” Friday’s assertion mentioned.
International Affairs Minister Anita Anand’s workplace mentioned Saturday she had spoken to her Danish and Greenlandic counterparts “to reiterate Canada’s steadfast help for the Kingdom of Denmark and Greenland’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.”
Anand is ready to go to Greenland’s capital of Nuuk “within the coming weeks” to open Canada’s new consulate there, which is a part of Ottawa’s new Arctic overseas coverage.
Danish and Greenlandic envoys are anticipated in Washington this week for talks with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and plans are additionally being put collectively for a bipartisan group of U.S. senators to go to Denmark.
Trump’s escalating rhetoric towards Greenland is testing the NATO alliance, which Danish and European officers in addition to overseas coverage specialists have warned may very well be ruptured completely by a U.S. takeover.
NATO Secretary-Normal Mark Rutte informed reporters in Croatia on Monday that alliance members had been discussing the following steps to collectively preserve the Arctic protected, however wouldn’t say if that would come with a NATO mission to Greenland particularly.
“All allies agree on the significance of the Arctic and Arctic safety,” Rutte mentioned at a press convention.
Trump on Sunday dismissed questions on whether or not taking up Greenland would fracture NATO, framing himself because the one who “saved” the alliance by forcing allies to spice up their defence spending.
“I like NATO,” he mentioned.
He then questioned “whether or not or not, if we would have liked NATO, would they be there for us? I’m undecided they might.”
NATO’s Article 5 lays out the precept of widespread defence, which treats an assault on one member as an assault on all of them. Article 5 has solely been invoked as soon as, within the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terror assaults on america, resulting in NATO’s operation in Afghanistan.
Trump acknowledged in an interview with the New York Instances final week that “it might be a alternative” for the U.S. to pursue taking up Greenland or preserving NATO.
In current days, Trump has mentioned Russian and Chinese language naval destroyers and submarines are encroaching within the Arctic and threatening Greenland’s sovereignty.
Requested in Beijing Monday about Trump’s feedback, Chinese language International Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning replied that “China’s actions within the Arctic are geared toward selling peace, stability, and sustainable growth within the area and are in accordance with worldwide regulation.” She didn’t elaborate on these actions.
“The rights and freedoms of all nations to conduct actions within the Arctic in accordance with the regulation ought to be totally revered,” Mao mentioned, with out mentioning Greenland instantly. “The U.S. mustn’t pursue its personal pursuits by utilizing different nations as a pretext.”
She mentioned that “the Arctic issues the general pursuits of the worldwide neighborhood.”
—With information from the Related Press
© 2026 International Information, a division of Corus Leisure Inc.
