“Is he tremendous necessary and that is the primary I am listening to of him?” one requested. “Is it a superfan polyglot who desires everybody to learn about his favorite author/composer? Is it somebody utilizing AI to artificially increase this man’s efficiency metrics?”
The Investigation
A Wikipedia editor who goes by “Grnrchst” just lately determined to seek out out, diving deep into the articles about Woodard and into any edits that positioned his identify in different articles. The outcomes of this prolonged and tedious investigation had been written up within the August 9 version of the Signpost, a volunteer-run on-line newspaper about Wikipedia.
Grnrchst’s conclusion was direct: “I found what I feel may need been the one largest self-promotion operation in Wikipedia’s historical past, spanning over a decade and protecting as many as 200 accounts and much more proxy IP addresses.”
A community of accounts with an uncommon curiosity in Woodard was recognized, and its actions over the past decade had been mapped. Beginning in 2015, these accounts inserted Woodard’s identify “into no fewer than 93 articles (together with ‘Pliers,’ ‘Brown pelican,’ and ‘Bundesautobahn’), usually referencing self-published sources by Woodard himself.” And that was simply within the English model of Wikipedia.
From 2017 to 2019, the accounts “created articles about David Woodard in no less than 92 completely different languages, creating a brand new article each six days on common… They began off with Latin-script European languages, however shortly branched out into different households and scripts from all corners of the globe, even writing articles in constructed languages; additionally they went from writing full-length article translations, to low-effort stub articles, which might go on to make up the overwhelming majority of all translations (simply 90 % or extra).” Translated languages included Nahuatl, Extremaduran, and Kirundi.
Grnrchst concluded that “this quantity of translations throughout so many alternative languages would both suggest this individual is without doubt one of the most superior polyglots in human historical past, or they had been spamming machine translations; the latter is extra probably.”
After a discount in exercise, issues ramped up once more in 2021, as IP addresses from around the globe began creating Woodard references and articles as soon as extra. As an illustration, “addresses from Canada, Germany, Indonesia, the UK and different locations added some trivia about Woodard to all 15 Wikipedia articles in regards to the calea ternifolia.”
Then issues received “extra subtle.” From December 2021 by means of June 2025, 183 articles had been created about Woodard, every in a special language’s Wikipedia and every by a singular account. These accounts adopted a sample of habits: They had been “created, usually with a reasonably generic identify, and made a person web page with a single picture on it. They then made dozens of minor edits to unrelated articles, earlier than creating an article about David Woodard, then making a dozen or so extra minor edits earlier than disappearing off the platform.”
Grnrchst believes that each one the exercise was meant to “create as many articles about Woodard as attainable, and to unfold images of and knowledge on Woodard to as many articles as attainable, whereas hiding that exercise as a lot as attainable… I got here to imagine that David Woodard himself, or somebody near him, had been working this community of accounts and IP addresses for the needs of cynical self-promotion.”
After the Grnrchst report, Wikipedia’s world stewards eliminated 235 articles on Woodard from Wikipedia situations with few customers or directors. Bigger Wikipedias had been free to make their very own group selections, they usually eliminated one other 80 articles and banned quite a few accounts.
“A full decade of devoted self-promotion by a person community has been undone in only some weeks by our group,” Grnrchst famous.
Ultimately, simply 20 articles about Woodard stay, comparable to this one in English, which doesn’t point out the controversy.
We had been unable to get in contact with Woodard, whose private web site is password-protected and solely accessible “by invitation.”
May the entire thing be some form of “artwork undertaking,” with the true payoff being publicity and being written about? Maybe. However regardless of the motive behind the decade-long effort to spice up Woodard on Wikipedia, the incident reminds us simply how a lot effort some persons are prepared to place into polluting open or public-facing initiatives for their very own ends.
This story initially appeared on Ars Technica.
