Each every so often I discover myself pondering the scientific veracity of pop songs. I’m a nerd, and I like music, so generally these worlds collide. It may be attention-grabbing to consider, and the investigation itself could be instructive—even enjoyable!
Contemplate, for example, the track “I Soften with You,” by the brand new wave band Fashionable English. It was arguably the group’s largest hit, and it’s nonetheless in rotation on traditional rock radio stations.
The track isn’t about science in any respect, but it has these outstanding lyrics:
On supporting science journalism
For those who’re having fun with this text, take into account supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By buying a subscription you might be serving to to make sure the way forward for impactful tales in regards to the discoveries and concepts shaping our world in the present day.
I’ll cease the world and soften with you
You’ve seen the distinction
And it’s getting higher on a regular basis
There’s nothing you and I gained’t do
I’ll cease the world and soften with you
So is it proper? If we cease the planet (let’s assume this implies halting Earth’s spin), will it soften? Amazingly, we are able to determine this out. The important thing right here is the quantity of power it could take to actually cease the world.
The power of movement known as kinetic power. You’ll be able to consider it as how a lot power have to be imparted to an enormous object to get it transferring at a sure pace. You have already got an intuitive really feel for this relating to acquainted objects; throwing a baseball at 100 kilometers per hour is quite a bit simpler (takes much less power) than getting a automobile as much as that very same pace. And, after all, for a given object, the upper the rate, the extra power wanted to get it as much as that pace.
Now, that is for linear, straight-line movement. There’s additionally rotational kinetic power, and once more, that is intuitive: it’s simpler to spin a basketball than a automobile. On this case, although, you even have to contemplate the dimensions of the thing. The bigger it’s, the extra rotational power it has for a given mass and spin.
Calculating these numbers isn’t all that tough. (It could possibly be a highschool homework downside.) The true problem is in figuring out what numbers to make use of. We now have to make a number of simplifying assumptions or else this rapidly burgeons right into a Ph.D. thesis. For instance, Earth isn’t a stable, homogeneous sphere however is as an alternative layered. It has a dense core, a lighter mantle, and so forth, every with a unique composition, which all have an effect on its whole spin power. Nonetheless, we’re not going for pinpoint accuracy right here, only a very tough quantity to see the place we stand.
Working by way of the equations, we discover that Earth’s rotational power is about 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (2 × 1029) joules, the metric unit of power. A single joule isn’t a lot—it takes about 300,000 joules to boost a liter of water from room temperature to its boiling level—however 2 × 1029, or greater than anoctillion of them, is quite a bit.
For comparability, it’s about the identical as our present annual international power use—over the course of roughly half a billion years.
That power is saved in Earth’s spin, which was gained as our planet fashioned 4.6 billion years in the past. As a result of physics is mostly okay with doing a little operations ahead or backward, this implies we’d additionally want that a lot power to cease our planet from rotating.
This presents two issues, as I see it. One is easy methods to do it and the opposite is what occurs once you do.
The how shouldn’t be trivial. That’s a incredible quantity of power. Consider it this manner: 66 million years in the past an asteroid 10 km broad—and several other instances the amount of Mount Everest—slammed into Earth at a pace 20 instances quicker than a rifle bullet. Its immense kinetic power was immediately transformed into warmth, making a colossal explosion that carved out a crater 200 km throughout, wiping out the nonavian dinosaurs and creating a worldwide ecological disaster that took thousands and thousands of years to recuperate from. And but the full power launched in that occasion was about 1023 joules, or about a millionth of Earth’s rotational kinetic power.
In different phrases, if you wish to cease our planet’s spin by hitting it with asteroids (aimed simply so to supply most braking energy), you’d should do the dinosaur-killer impression once more, then repeat it 999,999 instances.
I’m not a biologist, nevertheless it looks like this course of is likely to be detrimental to life on Earth.
However this asteroidal answer to our thought experiment brings up a great level: altering the power of an object normally results in heating it. Attempt to cease a spinning basketball utilizing friction out of your hand and it’ll noticeably warmth your pores and skin. Doing this for Earth would quickly dump all that warmth into the planet itself (and produce other vital catastrophic penalties). You might even see the place that is going.
So how a lot power wouldn’t it take to soften Earth? That is very tough to calculate, however fortunately physicists have executed a number of the work. In The Encyclopedia of Volcanoes, the power to soften simply Earth’s mantle—which is actually a stable and never a liquid—is proven to be about 3 × 1030 joules. (Curiously, it could take about the identical quantity of power to soften Earth’s stable internal core.) That’s greater than an element of 10 better than Earth’s rotational power, so straight away we have now our reply: stopping the world gained’t soften it—no less than, not fully.
Effectively, what about if we restrict it to simply Earth’s crust as a result of that’s the place all of us reside? Making some fast assumptions (akin to that it’s a 10-km-thick granite shell), I calculate that about 1030 joules of heating could be wanted to utterly liquify the crust (although I’ve seen considerably decrease estimates). So melting the crust is iffy, although it’s not like Earth shall be liveable after; the oceans would simply boil away with that a lot power dumped in them.
Is it doable to despin Earth with out overly heating it? Maybe, should you do it slowly: for instance, you might mount rocket engines with their enterprise ends going through east, then ignite them. A back-of-the-envelope calculation signifies a Falcon 9 rocket can generate a few trillion joules of power, so should you arrange one million of them and allow them to burn constantly for a number of million years you’ll be able to cease Earth’s rotation. Once more, there is likely to be some detrimental environmental impacts from this (in addition to fueling points). Higher examine with the suitable federal regulatory businesses.
Nonetheless, maybe we have to develop what we imply by “cease.” If Fashionable English meant stopping Earth in its orbit across the solar, how a lot power would that take? That is truly a lot simpler to calculate as a result of we all know Earth’s mass (6 × 1024 kilograms) and orbital velocity (30,000 meters per second): a whopping 3 × 1033 joules. That’s not solely sufficient to soften Earth by way of and thru nevertheless it’s additionally sufficient to vaporize it! Actually blowing up the world, Dying Star–model, “solely” takes about 1032 joules, so stopping the planet chilly in its orbital observe would certainly make our world very, very popular. In that state of affairs, the track is definitely understating the case.
Conclusion: Relying on the way you interpret the track, you’ll be able to certainly soften the world by stopping it. On the very least, it’ll do critical injury—or, as Fashionable English put it of their hit track, “I noticed the world crashing throughout your face.”
I’ve seen the distinction, nevertheless it’s undoubtedly not getting higher on a regular basis.
My because of my good friend Michael Walter, director of the Carnegie Science Earth & Planets Laboratory, for his assist with melting Earth’s mantle.
