Klaus Vedfelt | Digitalvision | Getty Photographs
As rounds of layoffs proceed inside a traditionally sturdy inventory market and resilient economic system, it’s nonetheless unusual for corporations to hyperlink job cuts on to AI alternative expertise.
IBM was an outlier when its CEO informed the Wall Road Journal in Could that 200 HR staff have been let go and changed with AI chatbots, whereas additionally stating that the corporate’s total headcount is up because it reinvests elsewhere.
Fintech firm Klarna has been among the many most clear in discussing how AI is remodeling – and shrinking – its workforce. “The reality is, the corporate has shrunk from about 5,000 to now nearly 3,000 staff,” Klarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski informed CNBC’s “Energy Lunch” in Could. “Should you go to LinkedIn and take a look at the roles, you may see how we’re shrinking.”
However employment consultants suspect that IBM and Klarna are usually not alone in AI-related purges. It is simply that companies usually restrict their explanations to phrases like reorganization, restructuring, and optimization, and that terminology may very well be AI in disguise.
“What we’re probably seeing is AI-driven workforce reshaping, with out the general public acknowledgment,” mentioned Christine Inge, an teacher {of professional} and government growth at Harvard College. “Only a few organizations are keen to say, ‘We’re changing folks with AI,’ even when that is successfully what’s taking place.”
“Many corporations are counting on these euphemisms as a defend,” mentioned Jason Leverant, chief working officer and president of AtWork Group, a nationwide staffing franchise that gives over 40,000 staff to corporations throughout quite a lot of sectors. Leverant says it’s a lot simpler to border workforce reductions as a element of a broader operational technique than admitting that they’re tied on to efficiencies discovered because of AI implementation. “Firms shedding as they embrace large-scale AI adoption is far too coincidental to disregard,” Leverant mentioned.
Candice Scarborough, director of cybersecurity and software program engineering at Parsons Company, mentioned it’s clear from latest sturdy earnings that layoffs are usually not a response to monetary struggles. “They align suspiciously properly with the rollout of huge AI programs. That implies that jobs are being eradicated after AI instruments are launched, not earlier than,” Scarborough mentioned.
She added that the usage of vaguer phrases could be higher messaging. Restructuring sounds proactive; enterprise optimization sounds strategic; and a concentrate on value buildings feels neutral. “However the result’s usually the identical: displacement by software program. Sandbagging these cuts underneath bland language helps corporations keep away from ‘AI backlash’ whereas nonetheless transferring forward with automation,” Scarborough mentioned.
Many corporations are reducing roles in content material, operations, customer support, and HR — features the place generative AI and agentic instruments are more and more succesful — whereas messaging the company selections as “effectivity” strikes regardless of wholesome steadiness sheets.
“This silence is strategic,” Inge mentioned. “Being specific about AI displacement invitations blowback from staff, the general public, and even regulators. Staying imprecise helps protect morale and handle optics through the transition behind the scenes.”
Messaging a dangerous synthetic intelligence labor shift
Inge and different consultants say there’s additionally a measure of danger administration in selections to de-emphasize AI in job elimination. Even corporations desirous to leverage AI to interchange staff usually notice they overestimated what the expertise can do.
“There’s completely an AI undercurrent behind a lot of at the moment’s ‘effectivity’ layoffs, particularly in back-office and customer support roles,” mentioned Taylor Goucher, vice chairman of gross sales and advertising and marketing at Connext International, an IT outsourcing agency. Firms are investing closely in automation, Goucher says, however corporations are typically pressured to backpedal.
“AI may automate 70%–90% of a course of, however the final mile nonetheless wants the human contact, particularly for QA, judgment calls, and edge instances,” Goucher mentioned.
Sticking to a hybrid mannequin of human plus AI would make extra sense for the early adoption part, however as soon as the roles are gone, corporations usually tend to flip to third-party hiring companies or abroad markets earlier than any U.S.-based jobs come again. “When the AI would not work out, they quietly outsource or rehire globally to bridge the hole,” Goucher mentioned.
Most companies will restrict details about these labor market strategic shifts.
“They concern backlash from staff, prospects, and buyers skeptical of half-baked AI guarantees,” Goucher mentioned. Many corporations tout their AI technique publicly, whereas quietly hiring expert offshore groups to deal with what AI cannot, he added. “It is a technique, however not at all times an entire one. Leaders have to be extra sincere about the place AI provides worth, and the place human experience continues to be irreplaceable,” he mentioned.
Inge agrees that whereas AI can do quite a bit, it will possibly’t substitute an entire human, but.
“AI can do a number of issues 90%. AI writes higher advert copy, however human judgment continues to be required. That 10% the place human judgment is required, we’re not going to see that changed within the close to time period. Some corporations are eliminating 100% of it, however it can come again to chew them,” Inge mentioned.
Mike Sinoway, CEO of San Francisco software program firm LucidWorks, mentioned the constraints with present AI — and a extra pervasive lack of certainty within the C-suite about adoption — are causes to imagine AI has not been instantly chargeable for many layoffs but. Reasonably than ducking the difficulty of the place AI is already changing staff, Sinoway mentioned his agency’s analysis suggests “higher-ups are panicking as a result of their AI efforts aren’t panning out.”
The primary to be informed AI took their jobs: 1099 staff
Beginning two to 3 years in the past, freelancers have been among the many first staff that corporations have been direct with in discussing AI’s function in job cuts.
“Typically, they’re being informed they’re being changed with an AI instrument,” Inge mentioned. “Individuals are keen to say that to a 1099 individual,” she added.
Copywriting, graphic design, and video enhancing have borne the brunt of the adjustments, based on Inge, and now the labor shift has begun to work its means into the full-time pressure. Inge says that transparency is one of the best coverage, however that is probably not sufficient. She pointed to the backlash that language studying firm Duolingo confronted when CEO Luis von Ahn introduced plans earlier this yr to part out contractors in favor of AI, after which was pressured to stroll again a few of his feedback.
“After the massive backlash that Duolingo confronted, corporations are afraid to say that’s what they’re doing. Individuals are going to get offended that AI is changing jobs,” Inge mentioned.
For now, the job market is stable, if exhibiting some indicators of softening within the first half of the yr. The U.S. unemployment price fell to 4.1% in June 2025, which based on Buying and selling Economics, indicators broad labor market stability. However there’s additionally common settlement that over time, the tempo of AI-linked job change will speed up. In accordance with the World Financial Discussion board’s 2025 Way forward for Jobs report, 41% of employers worldwide intend to cut back their workforce within the subsequent 5 years because of AI automation. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei lately predicted generative AI like his agency’s Claude giant language mannequin may wipe out as much as half of entry-level officer employee jobs.
There shall be a tipping level sooner or later when corporations shall be extra uniformly clear, however by that point, AI’s function within the labor market shall be apparent.
“By then it will not matter,” Inge mentioned. “Job losses shall be extraordinarily giant, the one factor we will do as people is adapt.”
