Suggestions is New Scientist’s widespread sideways have a look at the most recent science and know-how information. You’ll be able to submit gadgets you consider could amuse readers to Suggestions by emailing suggestions@newscientist.com
Mechanical turk
Suggestions is a grumpy kind, so we run a mile when confronted with any form of enforced enjoyable. It’s doable, due to this fact, that we’d wrestle to purchase an ice cream in Turkey, as a result of doing so requires having fun with, or a minimum of tolerating, an prolonged prank.
Turkish ice cream distributors are susceptible to taking part in methods on their clients, like handing them a cone filled with ice cream solely to whisk it out of their grasp utilizing sleight of hand. The routines are genuinely spectacular and take years to grasp. It’s simply that, if Suggestions needs an ice cream, we wish an ice cream, not a close-up magic present.
So we groaned inwardly when reporter Matthew Sparkes alerted us to a brand new early-stage paper uploaded to the web site arXiv, wherein engineers describe constructing a robotic that may mimic the Turkish ice cream vendor routine. They did this, Matt suggests, “as a result of all of the necessary analysis has been completed”.
The result’s a kind of robotic arms that may twist and rotate and customarily swing far and wide. The researchers programmed it with 5 Turkish ice cream vendor methods.
In a single, the robotic “bounces” the cone backward and forward, “creating the phantasm that the cone is ‘hopping’ away from the person”. In one other, the robotic “dodges the [user’s] hand by drawing a big, arcing path when the hand reaches the cone”. After which there’s “dancing”, which is “a non- interactive coverage that’s supposed to tease/taunt customers by circularly waving the cone upright out of the reachable vary of the customers.”
The robotic was then examined on precise folks. In contrast with a management situation the place the robotic simply handed over an ice cream with none mucking round, the methods induced folks to fee it as “extra misleading”. Apparently the methods additionally “elevated enjoyment-related outcomes (pleasure, engagement, problem) and perceived robotic competence, however decreased efficiency belief… perceived security, and self-competence”.
In different phrases: “Playful deception produces a structured tradeoff: it may possibly delight and maintain consideration however at the price of predictability and belief.” The authors suggest that “in safety-critical functions… the related declines in belief and security would seemingly be unacceptable”. Actually? You suppose?
Apposite acronyms
When Suggestions first requested to your recommendations for the most effective and worst scientific acronyms, we had no concept of the torrent that was coming our approach. Our inbox groans below the load of tangled phrase mixtures abbreviated into sequences of capitalised letters.
As an illustration, Stuart McGlashan notifies us a few conservation challenge that goals “to rejuvenate the marine and coastal surroundings of the Solway”: an inlet on the west coast of Nice Britain, on the border between England and Scotland. It’s known as the “Solway Coast And Marine Mission“, or SCAMP.
Stuart feels that the creators of the challenge have been unduly restrained. Given the emphasis on “restoration of sea life”, he says, may they not have appended another phrase to realize an much more apposite acronym? Suggestions agrees: it ought to positively have been the Solway Coast And Marine Preservation Initiative.
On the opposite aspect of the world, Jamie Pittock and Jennie Mallela on the Australian Nationwide College not too long ago bought funding for a challenge to review how the rivers flowing into the Indian Ocean are managed. Niftily, they known as it “Administration Of Rivers Discharging into Ocean Realms (MORDOR)”.
Nonetheless, this one is definitely a cautionary story. Jamie writes: “Once we marketed for a analysis officer, a Mr Bilbo Baggins from the Shire utilized. Happily a vastly extra certified candidate was out there and has been appointed.”
Shakespeare shake-up
Not too long ago, Suggestions defined that we have to rewrite two of William Shakespeare’s sonnets to take away inaccurate references to roses having thorns; these sharp issues are literally known as prickles. Reader James Fradgley has now written in to say that Shakespeare’s scientific illiteracy extends approach past botany, into astronomy.
In Julius Caesar, act 3, scene 1, the eponymous dictator boasts: “I’m fixed because the northern star / Of whose true-fix’d and resting high quality / There isn’t any fellow within the firmament.” Caesar is referring to Polaris, which is so near the celestial north pole that it barely strikes in any respect within the sky, whereas over the course of the 12 months the opposite stars rotate round it.
Besides that, as James says, on the time of Caesar’s assassination in 44 BC, “Polaris was not the northern star”. As a substitute, a star known as Kochab or Beta Ursae Minoris was the closest to the northern celestial pole – nevertheless it was by no means fairly shut sufficient to actually be mounted, so it wasn’t that helpful for navigation.
“Worse, Polaris is a Cepheid variable,” says James. This implies its brightness varies regularly, so it doesn’t even shine with a continuing depth. “All in all,” says James, “I actually don’t know why we hassle with Shakespeare.”
Suggestions is inclined to be extra forgiving. Our astronomical historical past information isn’t ok to inform us reliably whether or not the shifting pole stars had been recognized in Europe in Shakespeare’s time, however we really feel he was busy sufficient to have justifiably missed out on it. In the meantime, Cepheid variables weren’t noticed till 168 years after his demise, which appears to us to be a cast-iron excuse.
Bought a narrative for Suggestions?
You’ll be able to ship tales to Suggestions by e mail at suggestions@newscientist.com. Please embody your property tackle. This week’s and previous Feedbacks might be seen on our web site.
