The second strategy is repetition of a single materials, which invitations a heightened, nearly meditative deal with materiality itself, difficult how we understand the interaction between a substance and exterior forces. In Parallel Strata (1969), as an illustration, Suga stacks blocks of paraffin wax in a columnar formation. As curator Matilde Guidelli-Guidi factors out, the one true creative intervention is the selection to make use of this materials and repeat it till it generates a fort-like, architectural construction. The end result defies expectations: wax, usually related to softness, malleability and ephemerality, right here takes on a monolithic presence that’s structural, assertive and enduring.
An analogous logic drives Tender Concrete (1970), the place Suga dismantles our assumptions about solidity. Utilizing the standard parts of strengthened concrete—metal and cement—he subtly subverts function. The concrete, charged with machine oil, stays tender and viscous, barely contained by a inflexible metal framework. The piece exposes the futility of forcing matter into mounted varieties, permitting entropy to spill out, refusing closure. In each works, the fabric turns into a website of philosophical resistance, insisting by itself conduct, and gesturing towards the bounds of human makes an attempt to form, body or comprise the bodily world.
“Somewhat than conceiving sculptures as autonomous objects, Suga phases incongruous, at occasions absurdist sculptural conditions that probe the unstable order of issues,” says Guidelli-Guidi. One significantly hanging instance is Fieldology (1974), a three-part set up by which straw rope is stretched, sliced and bundled into exactly organized bales. The work features as a dynamic stage for testing relationships the place the dialogue between sculpture and physique, matter and vitality, unfolds in steady, cyclical trade. This performative essence of the interrelational nature of our area on the earth is embedded within the very course of of creating and putting in the work.

On this sense, Suga’s inquiries parallel these of artists like Robert Morris and others related to course of artwork. But for Suga, course of is rarely an finish in itself however as a substitute an invite to watch materials with radical attentiveness, free of the assumptions and associations usually linked to development, monumentality or sculptural permanence.
Within the Seventies, Suga was additionally working development jobs, and lots of the supplies he utilized in his artwork got here instantly from these websites: stone, heavy-duty timber, corrugated prefab concrete panels. Considered by this lens, and with an consciousness of the socio-political context of postwar Japan, Suga’s work reveals an undercurrent of political consciousness. His sculptural preparations grow to be testing grounds for the constructions that govern day by day life, exposing and unsettling the infrastructures of containment that reinforce energy dynamics and social hierarchies inside cities and communities. On this sense, his seemingly summary installations provide a delicate however incisive commentary on the function of structure in shaping our interplay with each materials and societal realities.
Thus far, we will additionally perceive how Suga’s work raises questions not solely about notion however about human and societal company itself. For Suga, kind isn’t the manifestation of the artist’s authorial will however the results of circumstances. In comparison with the notion of site-specificity or site-responsiveness embraced by many American artists of his technology, there’s a key distinction: Suga’s works had been typically created in relation to an area after which fairly actually left there, deserted to the results of surrounding phenomena. On this gesture lies a quiet however pointed critique of the anthropocentric worldview, revealing how human presence and motion are all the time a part of a broader entanglement of forces and entities, topic to the common logic of transformation that exceeds any phantasm of management or mastery by the homo faber.
On this, we will additionally detect echoes between Suga’s work and Deleuze and Guattari’s Assemblage Principle, which radically rethinks how issues (our bodies, objects, concepts, establishments) kind dynamic, provisional constellations. Embracing a deterritorialization of kind that disrupts any notion of secure id, Suga’s assemblages welcome the heterogeneity of the human and nonhuman, natural and artificial, residing and inert, bodily and discursive. His sculptural conditions provide a extra exact picture of actuality as processual, unstable and open-ended.
Inside this dimension of potential co-creation with matter—slightly than imposition or management—we discover affinities even with the novel notion of “important materialism” in Jane Bennett’s Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Issues (2010), a foundational textual content of post-anthropocentric materialist thought. In each Suga’s apply and Bennett’s writing, the nonhuman world isn’t merely symbolic or instrumental, however a collaborator in meaning-making—an agent in a subject of interdependencies that calls for a unique form of political and ecological attunement. As Bennett writes, “the moral activity at hand right here is to domesticate the flexibility to discern nonhuman vitality, to grow to be perceptually open to it.”