Drivers in Los Angeles County have a strong new privateness advocate after the L.A. County Board of Supervisors pushed to limit how their license plates are scanned by legislation enforcement.
The board not too long ago voted to ask the Sheriff’s Division to extra stringently regulate its use of the license plate information it collects by means of high-tech digicam programs mounted on patrol automobiles and above roads. The measure it accredited cited reporting from CalMatters that roughly a dozen police and sheriff’s departments all through Southern California shared such information with federal immigration businesses.
The September movement requests that the L.A. County Sheriff’s Division, which operates independently of the supervisors, conduct yearly privateness coaching for deputies with entry to license plate cameras and that the information be barred from use for non-criminal immigration enforcement.
It additionally requests the division delete plate sightings after 60 days except they’re flagged on felony lists.
The Sheriff’s Division “welcomes” the movement and plans to evaluation its practices and insurance policies, the division informed CalMatters. Per the movement, deputies are to report their license plate reader coverage adjustments to the county by January. It informed the Los Angeles Instances final month that it operates 931 automated readers.
Relying on the results of that report and whether or not Sheriff Robert Luna decides to observe the board’s course, mentioned Supervisor Hilda Solis, who was the lead creator of the movement, supervisors could take extra motion to additional regulate license plate readers in L.A.
The Sheriff’s Division informed CalMatters it has no “present” preparations for sharing license plate information with federal businesses. A California legislation enacted in 2015 prohibits the sharing of plate information with out-of-state and federal entities, and requires businesses that use plate readers to have a use and privateness coverage for them.
Most of the rules within the L.A. County movement mirror these in a bit of statewide laws vetoed by the governor earlier this month. That measure, Senate Invoice 274, sought to forestall misuse of license plate information by limiting the lists of license plates legislation enforcement can monitor and by requiring police to element a particular case or process power use once they use information from the cameras.
Solis mentioned she put ahead her movement partly as a result of she needed to publicly assist SB 274 earlier than Newsom selected it.
CalMatters didn’t discover that the L.A. County Sheriff’s Division shared information with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement or the U.S. Border Patrol, however some Los Angeles-area businesses did. The Los Angeles Police Division declined to remark when requested about such sharing.
License plate readers “stay a strong investigative device for recovering stolen automobiles, figuring out violent crime suspects, and discovering lacking individuals,” supervisors wrote in a September letter urging the governor to signal SB 274 into legislation. However “its public assist relies on confidence that the delicate location information it generates won’t ever be repurposed for impermissible civil immigration enforcement.”
Board Chairperson Kathryn Barger forged a lone “nay” vote in opposition to SB 274. Barger disapproved of the proposed restrict on the time-frame over which legislation enforcement businesses might retain plate information.
Barger informed CalMatters she believes this time restrict would have endangered the general public and made it tougher for police to resolve crimes, and that she helps Newsom’s veto. Newsom additionally opposed a 60-day information retention restrict within the state invoice, citing comparable causes.
However that’s the identical license plate information retention interval adopted by the California Freeway Patrol, and final yr the governor’s workplace known as a 28-day retention interval a stability between public security and privateness.
County supervisors have made immigration points a precedence, fast-tracking each the license plate movement and one other requesting a report on progress utilizing new state legal guidelines to guard colleges from ICE raids.
The county movement doesn’t apply to police departments since they’re ruled by native metropolis councils. The Los Angeles Metropolis Council has acquired about $400,000 in license plate reader know-how for the LAPD since June.
Two Los Angeles metropolis councilmembers, Eunisses Hernández and Hugo Soto-Martínez, constantly vote in opposition to the LAPD’s use of license plate readers, citing issues over their use in immigration enforcement.
“At a time when so a lot of our neighbors reside in worry, sharing delicate information solely will increase dangers and erodes confidence,” Hernández wrote in an announcement to CalMatters.
Legislation enforcement businesses utilizing automated license plate readers all through the state proceed to interrupt the legislation.
California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit in opposition to the El Cajon Police Division earlier this month for violating state legislation. Reporting by KPBS earlier this month discovered that this contains federal businesses like ICE. The lawyer normal’s workplace has additionally despatched letters to 18 businesses statewide since 2024 for potential violations of state legislation.
Following CalMatters reporting in June, subsequent reporting by Palo Alto On-line and the San Francisco Commonplace discovered that police departments in Atherton, Menlo Park and San Francisco violated state legislation. Within the wake of that reporting, final month Jennifer Wall, a metropolis council member within the Bay Space metropolis of Woodside, known as on the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Workplace to be extra clear about how deputies conclude that searches included in quarterly studies to the council adjust to native coverage.
When municipalities use automated license plate reader know-how, “we want to verify it’s used appropriately and mechanisms [are] in place to make sure it’s used appropriately,” she informed CalMatters. “There needs to be accountability for a way they’re used.”
Phoebe Huss and Khari Johnson write for CalMatters.
