Mark Harmon crouches low subsequent to log quantity 219: a moss-covered western hemlock tree trunk, 5 meters lengthy, mendacity useless on the bottom within the lush inexperienced woods. It’s marked by a skinny aluminum tag. The forest ecologist leans in shut, his unruly white beard almost brushing in opposition to the decomposing cylinder. Darkish, flaky patches on the boring, reddish-brown wooden nearer to the bottom present the place fungi have infiltrated the cellulose inside. Farther down the trunk, multicolored fungal conks protrude like laborious cabinets barely large enough for a mouse. A shiny black beetle scurries alongside the bottom, then out of sight below the log. Harmon presses gently on 219 with three fingertips. It’s so spongy that he’s reluctant to roll again a piece of it to disclose what lies beneath. “Oh, I don’t need to destroy it,” he says slowly. “It’s all falling aside.”
Harmon, a longtime school member at Oregon State College, has been watching quantity 219, and greater than 500 different logs close by, decay for 40 years. He has trekked to this web site within the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, a watershed nestled in Oregon’s western Cascade Mountains, not less than 100 instances. He drives greater than two hours on paved and gravel roads from his house in Corvallis, Ore., then hikes in half a mile by the undergrowth, carrying tape measures, scales, saws and a pc to chronicle the relentless modifications. His objective: set up an exhaustive baseline dataset that any scientist may use to check hypotheses about tree decomposition or to check patterns of decomposition within the Pacific Northwest with these in different areas.
Decomposition can clarify how and how briskly carbon, captured by crops throughout photosynthesis, returns to the environment. That course of, which performs out at dizzying scales of each area and time, influences the long-term productiveness and biodiversity of a forest. Harmon’s findings may affect when, and even whether or not, forest planners resolve to take away useless logs to enhance the well being of the woods. Decay shapes how wildfire spreads by a timberland, too. Snags (useless however standing trunks) and downed timber additionally present habitat for animals.
On supporting science journalism
Should you’re having fun with this text, think about supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By buying a subscription you’re serving to to make sure the way forward for impactful tales concerning the discoveries and concepts shaping our world immediately.
Earlier than Harmon and his colleagues launched this log-decomposition experiment, scientists learning the influence of useless wooden on the surroundings primarily appeared solely at what had already rotted, with out understanding the number of long-term elements that affected the decay. However by the early Eighties Harmon and different researchers realized patterns of decomposition emerged solely from detailed monitoring of precise logs sustained over a long time, like snapshots stitched collectively right into a multidimensional film. Even after 40 years, Harmon says, ecologists are unearthing new questions: How does temperature have an effect on the exercise of decomposers reminiscent of brown rot fungi on numerous wooden species? How do altering ecosystems promote or hinder interactions amongst invertebrates, microbes and wooden? At what charge is carbon launched from downed wooden? This final one is of explicit significance as a result of it impacts nutrient biking by soils and roots, in addition to local weather change.
Mark Harmon gently pulls up a piece of a tree carcass to disclose how deeply it has decomposed. For 4 a long time he has been gathering detailed measurements of greater than 500 logs at six forest websites, how bugs, fungi and microbes have an effect on decomposition charges, tissue density and sugar focus. Wooden breakdown impacts a forest’s resiliency, wildfire unfold and carbon dioxide emissions. Harmon’s successors are to gather knowledge for one more 160 years.
Harmon is main the best way to solutions, however he could by no means know what they’re. He designed the grand venture to run for not less than 200 years—nicely past his lifespan and people of his instant successors. Ecologist Jennifer Powers of the College of Minnesota says that Harmon “actually thought of long-term processes that form forests in establishing a examine he knew he would by no means see the tip of.”
Most individuals regard useless timber as a nuisance, a wasted useful resource or one thing to journey over. Harmon sees revelation. When he was 21, throughout a run within the hilly forests of central Massachusetts, he encountered a inexperienced log that appeared to glow in opposition to the darkish wooded backdrop. He had a imaginative and prescient that he would sooner or later run a analysis effort on log decay. Granted, he wasn’t totally clearheaded on the time. “It was helped by some substances,” he admits. “However I can nonetheless see that log.” For his first main analysis venture, Harmon in contrast decomposition charges of 10 species of timber killed by fires within the Smoky Mountains. Conifer species, he discovered, decayed extra slowly than deciduous timber, and Quercus prinus, the chestnut oak, decayed the quickest, dropping 11 % of its wooden density yearly.
In 1979 Jerry Franklin, on the time a forest ecologist at Oregon, visited the Smokies the place Harmon, then a graduate scholar on the College of Tennessee, occurred to be his tour information. Forestry college had taught Franklin {that a} useless tree was priceless provided that it have been loaded onto a truck and despatched to a mill. “However I got here to comprehend that this wooden I had been taught was a waste, a hearth hazard and an obstacle to journey had loads of worth,” Franklin says. It was nonetheless part of the forest, nonetheless boosting biodiversity by offering habitat and returning carbon and nitrogen to the soil, he explains.
Franklin acknowledged a likeminded soul in Harmon. In 1980 Harmon moved to Oregon to start out his doctorate, and some years later Franklin recruited him to run an experiment merely known as the Log Decomposition Venture. Harmon described it as a “‘They should be loopy, however perhaps not’ form of venture.” He launched the endeavor with particular however far-reaching scientific questions. He needed to understand how extensively the decay charge of hardwood differed amongst tree species, how colonies of microbial decomposers affected that charge, and whether or not bugs and different invertebrates sped up the method by bringing within the microbes.
The thought of slicing down a bunch of wholesome timber in a single location and hauling them elsewhere was a tough promote. Throughout one dinner at Oregon State, Harmon listened to the dean of the College of Forestry name the rising experiment the “most silly f–ing factor I’ve ever heard of in my life.” Individuals often reminded him that he would die earlier than it was completed or that “solely an fool” would wait 200 years for outcomes. Over time, nonetheless, funding continued to return by.
An aluminum tag identifies a log quantity 219, a western hemlock. Researchers have found that logs of various species may take wherever from three to 750 years to completely decompose.
In September 1985, below Harmon’s route, crews used chainsaws, loaders, grappling hooks, cables and shovels to chop down and drag almost 100 timber from an space kilometers throughout to rot at a clearing within the Andrews Experimental Forest. Every contemporary log was 5.5 meters lengthy and 45 to 65 centimeters in diameter. Since then, Harmon, nicknamed Dr. Loss of life by the Nationwide Science Basis, has come to this place, referred to as web site 3, many times to {photograph} the logs’ bodily look and to catalog the succession of bugs and different invertebrates that munch on and stay inside the rotting wooden. He makes use of digital calipers and scales hooked up to a laptop computer to measure lengths, widths, weights and tissue densities, and he carries digital devices to document the temperature, humidity and air stress of the forest. He’s additionally carried hundreds of “cookies”—disks a number of centimeters thick minimize from a log’s finish—again to the Andrews laboratory to tease out concentrations of sugars and monitor modifications in carbon and nitrogen content material. Each pattern has been barcoded and saved. After the primary assortment, thought-about time zero, Harmon’s staff stuffed a whole walk-in cooler with greater than 1,000 cross-sectional samples. His spouse, Janice Harmon, a plant ecologist, scanned the barcodes of greater than 35,000 entries over time. Plastic baggage stuffed with rotten wooden samples—some powdery, some chunky—nonetheless inhabit their storage in Corvallis, ready to be documented.
Because the crew arrange web site 3 in 1985, it additionally dragged quite a few different timber, equally minimize, to 5 extra websites scattered all through this forest. One employee navigating a loader on the web site, Harmon says, unleashed a string of expletives describing precisely what he thought concerning the venture. In complete, the crew positioned 530 logs representing 4 species that dominate this ecosystem: Douglas firs, western hemlocks, western pink cedars and Pacific silver firs. Because the starting of the second Reagan administration, Harmon has been main scientists, volunteers and college students to those hidden glades to measure in shut element the decay of the woody carcasses.
Though weathering, photo voltaic radiation and bugs all contribute to breakdown, wood-decomposing fungi do many of the injury. These almost invisible microorganisms typically hitchhike on invertebrates’ backs to get contained in the rotting wooden. To catalog these populations, Harmon and his colleagues delicately scrape them off the inside partitions of log cavities and into pattern baggage, together with no matter different tiny creatures are hanging round in there.
In the present day the forest is co-managed by the U.S. Forest Service, Oregon State College and the Willamette Nationwide Forest and hosts quite a lot of silviculture research. It has develop into a long-term lab the place scientists examine the results of disturbances reminiscent of floods and fires on a forest ecosystem. “As a result of we’ve got this [70-year] baseline,” says Mark Schulze, an assistant professor at Oregon State and the forest’s director, “we are able to actually perceive these processes.” The experimental forest is the right place for Harmon’s work as a result of decay performs out over scales that researchers don’t normally measure. The continued venture continues to be revealing new mysteries and has created a small however energetic subfield. Scientists are actually measuring tree decay in dozens of comparable undertakings on six continents. Researchers in China, Germany, and different nations are probing how the local weather, surroundings and decomposer populations in several areas work together to form decay. They’re how decay charges differ by species and placement, which might form insurance policies round forest administration and habitat safety. They’re feeding knowledge to local weather scientists, who can extra exactly mannequin the charges at which completely different sorts of forests could maintain or launch carbon.
Underneath some useless timber, the motion of decomposers may create new soil, however below others it could go away crumbled clay or sand.
Harmon is extensively considered the de facto pioneer of the sector, having revealed dozens of related papers which have garnered hundreds of citations. Hans Cornelissen, a techniques ecologist at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam who in 2012 launched Loglife, a log-decomposition venture within the Netherlands that mimics the Oregon examine on a smaller scale, calls Harmon the “founding father” of recent wood-decomposition science. Harmon is exacting, even obsessive, about tree decay. His focus is so deeply hardwired that he can’t ignore it. “It’s fairly aggravating, truly,” he says as we transfer away from log 219. He appears resigned, nearly exasperated. Irrespective of the place he goes or what he’s doing, even on trip, he says with a sigh, “I’m at all times seeing useless timber.”
It’s rapidly getting hotter on this Could morning as we make our approach by the continuing experiment. Different tagged specimens within the distance appear like random waves frozen on a inexperienced pond. The woods are quiet aside from the occasional knock of a downy woodpecker or the distant whistle of a diverse thrush. Harmon, now 72 and technically retired, simply straddles thigh-high berms and bobs below fallen conifers. He removes his laborious hat and wipes his forehead as we come up on a fallen western pink cedar, not a part of the experiment. Within the examine’s first couple of a long time, Harmon says, the researchers discovered that the outer sapwood of a western pink cedar decayed sooner than any a part of every other tree they examined. The inside heartwood, nonetheless, is probably the most decay-resistant, which is why it’s typically used to construct decks and raised-bed gardens for properties. Two extremes in a single species. Because of this, cedars have a tendency to face intact till their roots give out, they usually crash down abruptly—not like, say, Douglas firs, which are inclined to splinter in massive chunks, leaving standing snags. Bushes decay otherwise after they’ve fallen and are inside simpler attain of decomposing microbes than after they stay standing.
Individuals reminded Harmon that he would die earlier than the analysis was completed or that “solely an fool” would wait 200 years for outcomes.
Harmon places his laborious hat again on over his thinning tangle of darkish hair. I’m sporting a tough hat, too, as a result of massive timber drop massive limbs, though I query whether or not this plastic shell may defend me in opposition to a falling widow-maker. Just a few meters away Harmon factors out log quantity 218, a Douglas fir. Whereas the crumbling hemlock heartwood of log 219 appeared about to implode, this susceptible Douglas fir was agency sufficient for us to face on. The benefit of the Andrews log-decomposition examine, Harmon says, is that he and his staff know precisely when decay began—not the case for timber downed naturally—which helps them and different scientists extra clearly perceive the timeline and drivers of decay inside and amongst completely different species. “We knew that was our alternative,” he says. “These have been our preliminary [experimental] situations.”
Over the previous 40 years the mounting measurements have yielded sudden insights. Deadwood may stay on a forest ground or stand upright as a snag for wherever from three to 750 years. In a 2020 evaluation, Harmon and his colleagues estimated that decay charges can differ by a whopping 244-fold throughout species and climates. Heliocarpus appendiculatus, a tropical tree higher referred to as a jonote, loses almost 98 % of its mass a 12 months, whereas Eucalyptus camaldulensis, the river pink gum tree, endemic to Australia, loses solely about 0.4 % a 12 months. Charges can differ inside species, too. “You might have components of timber that might final lower than a decade and others as much as 1,000 years,” Harmon says.
One other shock is how drastically deadwood can alter the forest ground. Fallen timber don’t merely rot. Harmon rolls sturdy log 218 away from us to disclose a patch of mineral soil the colour of the darkest chocolate. It’s made up largely of crumbled clay, rocks and sand, versus natural soil, which incorporates decaying natural matter reminiscent of that from timber and leaves. Fungal tendrils twist by the darkish brown mat.
Wildfire in August 2023 nearly ruined the 40-year decomposition experiment, consuming three of the six log websites. Vivid-orange fireplace moss has rapidly colonized a number of the burned panorama.
“This forest ground has form of melted away,” Harmon says. Natural soil digested by fungi or nematodes or micro organism below the log hadn’t been replenished. But leaves and branches falling on the log had accrued and decayed over a long time, producing a fertile natural soil on high of the log, the place moss and different crops have been now rising. “The log has principally elevated the forest ground 50 centimeters off the bottom,” Harmon says. Fallen timber shift the chemistry of the soil under and above and, with that, the inhabitants of microbes within the surroundings.
Harmon’s group discovered that the soil modifications the tree, too, as ants and different bugs ferry filth and microbes into the decaying log. Whether or not a useless tree touches mineral soil, stands as a snag or stays suspended over the forest ground after falling in opposition to a dwelling tree can dramatically affect the focus of carbon it shops. And the combination of the various decay elements influences the chance that new timber will take maintain in that floor, reshaping the habitat of a forest, which in flip impacts the general well being of the area.
A forest dominated by slow-rotting species can maintain monumental shops of carbon for many years or centuries, whereas rapidly decaying species can launch plenty of carbon into the air. Extrapolated to a worldwide stage, sequestration and emission can considerably have an effect on quantities of atmospheric carbon dioxide and due to this fact affect local weather change.
Figuring out these charges is especially necessary to local weather change modelers, says Jonathan Schilling, whose lab on the College of Minnesota focuses on decomposition and fungi. He has run wood-decomposition experiments in Alaska and New Zealand, amongst different locations. “We’ve bought logs rotting in every single place,” he says. In 2024 he and his colleagues in contrast the decomposition preferences of white rot—fungi that break aside the robust lignin in timber and thus launch the carbon dioxide—with these of brown rot, which head for the cellulose, leaving the lignin behind.
“There’s much more carbon left behind within the soil for the brown rot mechanism,” Schilling says. That issues as a result of white rot fungi, which desire hotter forests, are encroaching on northern areas due to altering temperatures and rainfall. The end result? Extra carbon dioxide will get pumped into the air. “There’s loads of carbon at stake,” Schilling says, “and sufficient uncertainty that we have to understand how that course of works.”
The Andrews experiment has impressed many others around the globe. Within the 2000s Powers launched the primary tropical decomposition examine, which concerned 14 nations, with Harmon’s work as a mannequin. In 2012 Cornelissen and his crew within the Netherlands organized logs of 25 species in two “tree cemeteries” for his Loglife experiment. Cornelissen has additionally collaborated on decomposition tasks in Romania, Germany and China. In 2024 he labored with Amy Zanne, an ecologist on the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Research in Millbrook, N.Y., on a evaluate of wood-decomposition research that explains various decomposition patterns around the globe. Zanne sees a hidden wonderland in decomposition, populated by ignored, disregarded gamers that nonetheless have vital roles in an evolving ecosystem. “I really like desirous about the underdogs, the underseen issues, and the way hidden issues make the world go spherical,” she says.
Harmon nearly misplaced the complete Andrews venture on August 5, 2023, when lightning struck a tree on Lookout Ridge. Fireplace unfold rapidly, and inside just a few weeks it had incinerated 70 % of the watershed, almost 10,500 hectares. It burned by three of the six log-decomposition websites, stripping dwelling timber of leaves and incinerating a lot of the deadwood, which was a blow. After Harmon and I hike again to the gravel street close to web site 3, we drive farther up the ridge, get out and stroll by the ghostly stays of web site 6.
Practically two years on, this web site retains a faint, mephitic whiff of smoke and char. The fireplace felled big firs and sculpted cedars, and the burned boles nonetheless stand in scorched, summary shapes. Remaining branches, leafless and skinny, glow silver in opposition to the darkish snags within the sharp afternoon solar. They’ll fall finally. Harmon squats and cradles a singed aluminum tag, barely readable, figuring out a spherical, blackened wooden skeleton as a western hemlock. There aren’t any scurrying beetles in sight.
The 2023 Lookout Fireplace left tons of of snags—useless trunks that stay standing. Lifeless Douglas firs are inclined to splinter and fall in items; cedars have a tendency to face till their roots give out after which crash down right away. Ongoing examine of scorched logs ought to uncover how fireplace ash and charcoal alter decomposing wooden.
Fireplace modifications the sport, Harmon says. It may be tragic. But it is usually a possibility to see a forest in a brand new mild. “It’s modified, however, , it’s going to return again. It’s going to be one other manifestation of the identical factor,” Harmon says. In contrast to in web site 3, the natural soil right here has all however vanished below ash and charcoal. It’s unclear which of the 4 species within the log-decomposition venture could proliferate most in areas devastated by fireplace. And regardless that fireplace kills timber, it doesn’t take away them. Harmon factors to a snag, perhaps 30 toes tall, with tiny mushrooms protruding from cracks. He notes a bit of patch of uncovered mineral soil the place seedlings have emerged. New timber will develop with the legacy of snags and downed timber round them, and the brand new forest could also be much more structurally attention-grabbing.
The longer term, after all, is unsure. The log-decomposition venture is one in every of 27 within the Lengthy-Time period Ecological Analysis community, a group of large-scale experiments funded by the Nationwide Science Basis probing all the pieces from how increasing cities have an effect on tree-growth charges to how disturbances reminiscent of excessive wind, fireplace and flood shake up an ecosystem. Funding has at all times been a difficulty, and Harmon, Franklin, and others fear that latest widespread cuts to federal grants could attain the Andrews experiment. Its timescale may reserve it. The venture requires little upkeep, and the logs will rot whether or not anybody is watching them or not. For now, somebody is.
Harmon retired in 2016 however can’t keep away; he’s nonetheless churning by monumental datasets to publish papers. He has turned the reins over to 2 youthful researchers at Oregon State: Georgia Seyfried, a soil scientist who research biogeochemical processes, and Jacob Bukoski, an ecologist who focuses on carbon biking and local weather change mitigation. “I believe there’s an actual alternative right here,” says Bukoski, who appears to be like ahead to working fireplace into the more and more complicated, rising view of decomposition.
On our approach again to the forest headquarters, Harmon and I cross a slender stream flanked with hemlocks and pull over. We stroll about 45 meters into the forest—over useless logs, below useless logs—and arrive at one in every of Harmon’s sacred spots, a grove of big Douglas firs. Their trunks stretch not less than two meters throughout. Their lowest branches are greater than many of the different surrounding treetops. These behemoths are older than the Mona Lisa. We stand silently within the shadow of the dwelling giants for just a few moments. With their thick, deep furrows and invisible crowns, they appear invincible and infinite. However that’s an phantasm, Harmon says. This scene is a snapshot. After the timber fall—until they burn—they’ll in all probability stay intact on the forest ground for one more few hundred years, housing bugs, reworking the forest and finally sinking softly into the contours of the brand new woodland, within the shadow of latest giants.
Scientists used to imagine that decomposition was instantaneous, Harmon says—that when a tree dies, it primarily disappears. “However that’s not true wherever on Earth, and it’s by no means been true,” he says. A useless tree is “only a transition to one thing else.”
