October 30, 2025
3 min learn
‘Dueling Dinosaurs’ Fossil Solves the Thriller of a ‘Mini T. rex’
An evaluation suggests Nanotyrannus is a separate, smaller dinosaur that lived alongside T. rex, settling a 30-year debate
Nanotyrannus seems to be a separate, smaller relative of Tyrannosaurus rex that shared its habitat. This illustration visualizes a Nanotyrannus pack attacking a juvenile T. rex.
For greater than three a long time, paleontologists have argued over whether or not a lithe predatory dinosaur referred to as Nanotyrannus ever actually prowled Cretaceous North America—or whether or not the bones that some researchers attributed to the creature as a substitute belonged to teenage examples of Tyrannosaurus rex that have been nonetheless rising into their monstrous body. A brand new research in Nature could have lastly settled the rating in favor of Nanotyrannus based mostly on an evaluation of Montana’s placing “Dueling Dinosaurs” fossil, found in 2006. The fossil reveals a triceratops entwined with a small tyrannosaurlike dinosaur, each with important accidents.
“Merely put, the Dueling Dinosaur Nanotyrannus is totally grown at half the size and one tenth the physique mass of a mature T. rex,” says research co-author Lindsay Zanno, a paleontologist at North Carolina State College. “There is no such thing as a state of affairs wherein this animal morphs right into a T. rex.” She explains that Nanotyrannus will need to have been a smaller, sleeker predator that hunted alongside Tyrannosaurus.

Cranium of Nanotyrannus lancensis.
North Carolina Museum of Pure Sciences (CC BY-NC-ND)
On supporting science journalism
When you’re having fun with this text, take into account supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By buying a subscription you might be serving to to make sure the way forward for impactful tales in regards to the discoveries and concepts shaping our world at this time.
Probably the most definitive proof comes from a microscopic characteristic referred to as an exterior basic system—a collection of tightly packed development rings in bone—that implies the fossilized animal had completed rising, explains research co-author James G. Napoli, a paleontologist at Stony Brook College. Zanno and Napoli argue this confirms Nanotyrannus as a definite genus alongside T. rex within the ecosystem of the fossil-rich Hell Creek Formation website in Montana, which spanned the final million years of the Cretaceous.
Utilizing high-resolution scans, the workforce additionally discovered the Nanotyrannus cranium contained extra tooth sockets than a T. rex of any age and completely different routes for cranial nerves and sinuses than T. rex reveals. These options would have been established early in embryonic improvement and stay fastened for all times.
The researchers performed a computer-based evolutionary evaluation, which positioned Nanotyrannus in a brand new clade simply exterior the T. rex line. This clade, referred to as Nanotyrannidae, could have originated in jap North America.

The N. lancensis specimen from the Dueling Dinosaurs fossil included the primary full tail of the Nanotyrannus genus to be discovered.
North Carolina Museum of Pure Sciences (CC BY-NC-ND)
Moreover, the workforce in contrast the Dueling Dinosaurs specimen with two earlier finds that have been additionally made in Montana’s Hell Creek Formation—a cranium unearthed by a workforce from the Cleveland Museum of Pure Historical past (CMNH) that first outlined Nanotyrannus and a fossil referred to as “Jane” that was found by a workforce from the Burpee Museum of Pure Historical past. In doing so, Zanno and Napoli formalized the names of those specimens: They confirmed the Dueling Dinosaurs fossil represented the identical species because the CMNH cranium, which was named Nanotyrannus lancensis in 1988. They usually described Jane as a brand new species, Nanotyrannus lethaeus.
That image builds on hints famous a long time in the past by paleontologist Philip J. Currie, who co-authored the 1988 paper that first named Nanotyrannus. Currie says he nonetheless factors to Nanotyrannus’s increased tooth counts as a definitive distinction from T. rex. Thomas R. Holtz, Jr., a paleontologist on the College of Maryland, who was not a part of the brand new paper, observes that such pairing isn’t unprecedented—Asia’s tyrannosaur Tarbosaurus lived beside the smaller tyrannosaur Alioramus, with the 2 splitting the menu between big and fleet-footed prey.

A comparability of the arms of Nanotyrannus and T. rex.
North Carolina Museum of Pure Sciences (CC BY-NC-ND)
Lengthy-time advocates of the juvenile T. rex speculation, although acknowledging the sturdy proof within the new paper, aren’t but able to rewrite the household tree of T. Rex and its kin. Stephen Brusatte, an evolutionary biologist on the College of Edinburgh, who was not concerned within the research, asks, “If each small skeleton is Nanotyrannus, the place are the juvenile T. rexes?” Paleontologist Thomas Carr of Carthage School, who was additionally not a part of the analysis, argues that skeletal maturity alone doesn’t outline a species. With out extra small T. rex fossils, he says, distinguishing development from evolution stays tough.
Nonetheless, Nanotyrannus provides a contemporary dimension to the ultimate days of the dinosaurs. Somewhat than a one-species monopoly beneath T. rex, the Hell Creek panorama could have hosted a tiered guild of hunters. Zanno calls the following problem “a totally new query” for analysis on tyrannosaurs and their relations: understanding how Nanotyrannus and Tyrannosaurus coexisted, averted competitors and formed the evolution of their prey. Napoli says the findings problem a long time of decoding these littler dinosaurs as juvenile T. rexes. “Now that we’ve corrected the report on Nanotyrannus, we predict it’s attainable that different smaller tyrannosaur fossils are misidentified and that there could also be many extra species awaiting recognition.”
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
When you loved this text, I’d prefer to ask to your help. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and trade for 180 years, and proper now would be the most important second in that two-century historical past.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I used to be 12 years previous, and it helped form the way in which I have a look at the world. SciAm at all times educates and delights me, and conjures up a way of awe for our huge, stunning universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
When you subscribe to Scientific American, you assist be certain that our protection is centered on significant analysis and discovery; that we now have the assets to report on the choices that threaten labs throughout the U.S.; and that we help each budding and dealing scientists at a time when the worth of science itself too usually goes unrecognized.
In return, you get important information, fascinating podcasts, good infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch movies, difficult video games, and the science world’s greatest writing and reporting. You possibly can even present somebody a subscription.
There has by no means been a extra vital time for us to face up and present why science issues. I hope you’ll help us in that mission.
