Israeli Ambassador to the U.N. Danny Danon displays on Hamas’ assault on Israel, two years later, on ‘The Claman Countdown.’
FIRST ON FOX — At the very least a dozen Republican state attorneys common from throughout the USA signed a letter to Meta Platforms Chief Authorized Officer Jennifer Newstead demanding solutions on the corporate’s actions following the Oct. 7, 2023, terror assaults in Israel.
“We, the 12 undersigned Attorneys Normal, write to precise our critical issues over latest allegations relating to Meta’s actions following the October 7, 2023, bloodbath and terrorist assault in Israel,” the letter, despatched to Meta a day after the two-year anniversary of the assaults, mentioned.
The attorneys common are calling on Newstead to offer Meta’s newest coverage on depictions of violence and incitement, in addition to another related insurance policies. Newstead can also be requested to explain “remedial efforts,” if any, that Meta made after the Oct. 7 assaults. Moreover, the attorneys common requested Newstead to element another steps Meta has taken to forestall unlawful violence from being displayed on its platforms.
SOCIAL MEDIA GIANTS SCRAMBLE TO CONTROL CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION VIDEOS AFTER UTAH SHOOTING
Hamas fighters destroy a tank of Israeli forces in Gaza Metropolis on Oct. 07, 2023. (Hani Alshaer/Anadolu Company through Getty Photos / Getty Photos)
The attorneys common requested Newstead to offer a response to the letter by Nov. 10, 2025.
The attorneys common who signed the letter are Alan Wilson of South Carolina, Brenna Chicken of Iowa, Steve Marshall of Alabama, Tim Griffin of Arkansas, James Uthmeier of Florida, Todd Rokita of Indiana, Gentner Drummond of Oklahoma, Catherine Hanaway of Missouri, Austin Knudsen of Montana, Mike Hilgers of Nebraska, Marty Jackley of South Dakota, and Ken Paxton of Texas.
Meta’s present coverage — which has been modified a number of occasions because the assaults — says it removes “threats of violence towards numerous targets” and defines threats of violence as “statements or visuals representing an intention, aspiration, or name for violence towards a goal, and threats could be expressed in numerous kinds of statements similar to statements of intent, requires motion, advocacy, expressions of hope, aspirational statements and conditional statements.”
Moreover, Meta says on its web site that it protects customers from “depictions of kidnappings or abductions” and depictions of “high-severity or mid-severity violence.”
“Hamas is banned from our platforms, and we take away content material that helps and glorifies them and the terrorist assaults on October seventh,” a Meta spokesperson mentioned in an announcement to FOX Enterprise. “Following the assaults, we shaped devoted groups that labored across the clock to handle and take away content material that violates our insurance policies, whereas making certain our platforms can nonetheless be used to sentence Hamas and lift consciousness of their victims and the hostages nonetheless being held in Gaza.”
Households of Oct. 7 victims are suing Meta for allegedly enjoying a task within the distribution of photos and video of the atrocities. (Nikolas Kokovlis/NurPhoto through / Getty Photos)
IT’S UP TO HAMAS IF THEY WANT LONG-TERM PEACE, REP. BRANDON GILL SAYS
The Meta spokesperson additionally famous that the corporate established a particular operations middle after the truth that included fluent Hebrew and Arabic audio system who might monitor the state of affairs in actual time, permitting delicate content material to be eliminated sooner. The spokesperson mentioned that within the three days following the assaults, the corporate eliminated or marked as disturbing over 795,000 items of content material that violated its insurance policies.
The letter comes after households of Oct. 7 victims filed a $1 billion lawsuit towards Meta, claiming the corporate’s platforms performed a task within the distribution of video exhibiting the atrocities.
Within the go well with, victims’ family members declare that Meta knowingly enabled the distribution of dwell and recorded video of atrocities, similar to homicide and hostage-taking, in accordance with CTech, an Israeli know-how information outlet. The plaintiffs say that this turned Fb and Instagram into “an integral a part of the terrorist assault on Israel,” CTech added.
“If the plaintiff-victims’ allegations are true, it’s arduous to see how Meta has met its personal requirements,” the attorneys common wrote within the letter to Newstead.
One of many plaintiffs is Mor Baider, who noticed the horrific video of her grandmother’s homicide on Fb after desperately attempting to succeed in her, in accordance with CTech. The outlet mentioned that after failing to succeed in her grandmother, Bracha Levinson, who was a resident of Kibbutz Nir Oz, Baider appeared on social media for solutions. She as a substitute discovered the violent video on the platform.
An image taken within the southern Israeli metropolis of Ashkelon on Oct. 7, 2023, reveals burnt-out autos outdoors a residential constructing hit in a rocket assault from the Gaza Strip. (Ahmad Gharabli/AFP through Getty Photos)
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE
“For a lot of hours, in actual time and lengthy after the terrorist assault, horrific documentation from the assault (to place it mildly) was disseminated, exhibiting harmless civilians — kids, aged, ladies, and males — subjected to atrocities that even paper can not bear to explain,” the plaintiffs’ attorneys wrote, in accordance with CTech.
The Idan household, which can also be included within the lawsuit, claims that the homicide of 22-year-old Maayan Idan and the kidnapping of her father, Tsachi, have been live-streamed on Fb, in accordance with CTech, which famous that Tsachi was later killed in captivity.
FOX Enterprise reached out to a legislation agency representing the plaintiffs for remark.
