X/@SenJohnKennedy
A couple of weeks again, the senator John Kennedy put his two cents into the matter of the $2 million settlements in favor of former FBI officers Peter Strzok and Lisa Web page. The funds had been a results of anti-Trump protagonists submitting fits towards the U.S. authorities for his or her dismissal because of politically charged misconduct. He put the Legal professional Common, Merrick Garland, and the previous FBI director, Christopher Wray, on the spot for this resolution earlier than the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Commercial
The Louisianan by no means held himself again in his questioning of the newly appointed FBI Director Kash Patel. Kennedy wrapped up his remarks in traditional Kennedy trend: reminding all current simply who Strzok and Web page are – FBI brokers whose textual content messages had been crammed with proof of political bias towards candidate Trump. In one of many messages, Web page wrote “Trump’s not ever going to be president, proper? Proper?” and Strzok replied “No, no, he gained’t. We’ll cease it.”
Strzok was fired. Web page give up her job. Then they took the federal government to court docket over the discharge of emails. Someway, they ended up with a $1.2 million settlement for Strzok and $800,000 for Web page. That’s two million {dollars} coming from taxpayers. Kennedy bought Director Patel to verify that the settlement was selected by Legal professional Common Garland and Director Wray in the course of the Biden administration.
Predictably, there was some uproar on the Web. One commenter stated it properly, “There’s completely NO END to the methods the federal authorities will piss away BILLIONS OF-DOLLARS that comes from exhausting working taxpayers.” One other remark learn, “Disgusting. They need to be in jail, not getting some pay-off.”
For some individuals, this was merely payback. “Repay for all their anti Trump efforts,” stated one of many commenters. One other steered that this was hush cash and speculated that the settlement in all probability contained NDA provisions “that forestalls them from ever credibly flipping even when they wish to.”
Peter Strzok and Lisa Web page are each aggressive anti-Trump political activists who weaponized their positions to go after President Trump.
So why then did the Biden Justice Division settle a lawsuit introduced by Strzok and Web page, handing them $2 million in taxpayer cash? pic.twitter.com/YXeiOsCSPM
— John Kennedy (@SenJohnKennedy) September 16, 2025
However Kennedy’s anger surprisingly did not persuade a few of his critics, one among whom retorted: “Why would he waste time on this nonsense if nothing goes to return of it?” One other went on to defend the Justice Division’s independence by stating, “And that isn’t the Biden Justice Division, that’s The Justice Division unbiased from the President accurately.”
Commercial
The Strzok-Web page drama has been simmering for years, however information on the settlement sums makes for contemporary ammunition. Kennedy’s questioning lays direct accountability on excessive Biden administration officers for endorsing what many devolve into being a reward for misconduct. Whether or not there’ll ever be accountability stays to be seen however will positive not silence these issues about weaponized authorities businesses. This unfolding story of political bias on the highest degree of regulation enforcement goes to proceed, and this two million-dollar chapter would possibly very properly be one of many costliest ones but. This example has drawn comparisons to controversial feedback made by the senator up to now, and it has sparked a heated political backlash not not like the outrage following his 9/11 tribute.
