LONDON — Prince Andrew could have given up his titles, however the questions on his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein haven’t given up on him — or Britain’s embattled royal household.
Seemingly daily, damaging new reviews emerge about Andrew, 65, his friendship with the late pedophile financier, and allegations the prince had intercourse with trafficked Epstein sufferer Virginia Roberts Giuffre when she was 17, which he denies.
In her posthumous memoir “No person’s Woman” launched Tuesday, Giuffre, who died by suicide in April at age 41, stated Andrew acted as if having intercourse along with her “was his birthright.”
Andrew, who in February 2022 reached a authorized settlement with Giuffre after she filed a civil case towards him in a New York court docket, has repeatedly denied having met her.
However the rolling scandal refuses to go away, and has the potential to inflict additional harm on a monarchy whose recognition continues to dwindle after the demise of the broadly beloved Queen Elizabeth II in 2022.
King Charles III has sought to insulate “the Agency” from the cloud over his youthful brother. Andrew stated in a press release final week that with Charles’ “settlement,” he would “not use my title or the honours which have been conferred upon me,” together with Duke of York.
However there are nonetheless unanswered questions on what the palace knew, and when, with calls from lawmakers and others for the royals to oust Andrew fully.
“The deep and vast assist for the queen meant the household was capable of higher climate all of the controversies that might emerge — and it is a unhealthy one,” stated Craig Prescott, who teaches legislation at Royal Holloway, College of London and specializes on the constitutional and political function of the monarchy.
“These particular allegations are, in fact, terribly damaging within the first place, however in addition they run counter to a number of the causes that members of the royal household take up,” he stated.
Friday’s settlement for Andrew to relinquish his titles got here after emails revealed in paperwork for a court docket case not involving the prince confirmed he had been involved with Epstein for longer than he beforehand admitted.
That “makes him look, in black and white, a liar,” NBC Information’ royal contributor Daisy McAndrew informed “TODAY” on Sunday. “And so how will you belief anything he says?”
Then Sunday, London’s Metropolitan Police stated it was investigating reviews that Andrew had requested one among its officers to dig up grime on Giuffre. A Buckingham Palace official informed NBC Information these reviews ought to be “examined within the applicable method.”
Monday introduced two additional revelations: First that Andrew had not paid lease on his Royal Lodge residence for 20 years, revealed in a Freedom of Data request by The Occasions newspaper to the Crown Property, which handles royal funds. Neither Andrew nor Buckingham Palace have responded to the report.
Then got here the publication of Giuffre’s posthumous memoir.
She wrote that she had intercourse with the prince on three events, together with an “orgy” involving “eight different younger ladies” who “seemed to be underneath the age of 18 and didn’t actually communicate English.”
She then suffered three weeks of “irregular bleeding,” earlier than waking up in a “pool of blood” and being taken to hospital by Epstein, she wrote.
Epstein, who died by suicide in jail in 2019 shortly after he was arrested on federal intercourse trafficking fees, later informed her she had suffered a miscarriage, and he or she suspected him of conspiring with the physician to maintain it quiet, Giuffre stated.
On seeing a photograph of Andrew and Epstein strolling in New York’s Central Park in 2010 — after Epstein was convicted of soliciting prostitution of somebody underneath the age of 18 — Giuffre wrote she was “revolted to see two of my abusers collectively, out for a stroll.” However “principally I used to be amazed {that a} member of the Royal Household can be silly sufficient to seem in public with Epstein.”
Andrew has beforehand denied these allegations, saying that he has “no recollection of ever assembly this woman, none in any way.” In his assertion asserting the relinquishment of his titles, he stated, “I vigorously deny the accusations towards me.”
The civil intercourse abuse lawsuit introduced by Giuffre towards Andrew was settled out of court docket for an undisclosed sum.
Although Buckingham Palace routinely says it doesn’t communicate for the prince, Andrew has loved a outstanding function at some current royal occasions, together with the queen’s funeral.
Some lawmakers are demanding that Andrew be formally stripped of his titles by an act of Parliament — a uncommon foray into regal issues by Britain’s supposedly separate authorities.
The final time this occurred was in 1917, when Parliament used the Titles Deprivation Act to strip German members of the British royal household of their titles throughout World Battle I.
That’s not with out dangers, in line with Prescott at Royal Holloway.
“You probably have laws eradicating the dukedom from Prince Andrew, may a cheeky MP need to desk an modification and take away the dukedom of Sussex from Prince Harry?” he stated.
The federal government indicated it doesn’t assist this. Schooling Secretary Bridget Phillipson stated Monday that whereas “our ideas must be with the victims of Jeffrey Epstein, these “are issues for the royal household.”
The nuclear possibility would contain the king himself utilizing one thing known as “Letters Patent” to strip Andrew of his designation as prince.
In doing so, the palace should weigh distancing itself from Andrew with making certain the blowback from any additional censure doesn’t do much more harm to an establishment that requires public buy-in.
“It’s true that the monarchy isn’t voted in,” Prescott stated. “But when the general public temper shifted and folks not wished to have the monarchy, you then think about that politics would comply with.”
