In January President Donald Trump made a daring pronouncement, calling for colossal funding in a missile protection protect known as Iron Dome for America, later renamed the Golden Dome for America. It could coordinate missile interceptors that might be fired from the bottom or from house, in addition to radar arrays, lasers, digital weapons and networks of sensor-equipped satellites. Meant to protect your complete continental U.S. at minimal, it could be vastly bigger in scale and class than present, largely U.S.-designed missile protection programs in locations resembling Israel, South Korea and Japanese Europe.
If this weren’t daring sufficient, Trump upped the ante throughout a White Home press convention in Could, proclaiming that Golden Dome could be absolutely operational by the top of his time period for a complete value of $175 billion. The race to satisfy that looming deadline really started in July, when Congress appropriated a down fee of $25 billion for the initiative. Officers from the Division of Protection—now being renamed the Division of Warfare—have subsequently mentioned the first main check of Golden Dome is focused for the fourth quarter of 2028, simply earlier than the subsequent presidential election.
But a number of months and billions of {dollars} later, few additional particulars have been launched concerning the venture’s scope and logistics. So many main unknowns stay that unease about this system is mounting amongst many policymakers, missile protection specialists and geopolitical analysts. Why, they marvel, is there such a rush to proceed when the plan itself stays so nebulous? How can its feasibility and dangers be correctly evaluated with out a clearer image of what precisely is even being thought of or pursued? Is Golden Dome destined to be a essential pillar of U.S. protection—or a multibillion-dollar boondoggle higher at lining the pockets of Trump administration allies than at capturing down any missiles?
On supporting science journalism
In case you’re having fun with this text, contemplate supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By buying a subscription you might be serving to to make sure the way forward for impactful tales concerning the discoveries and concepts shaping our world at the moment.
An early-August knowledgeable gathering in Huntsville, Ala.—the annual Area and Missile Protection Symposium—supplied a worthwhile alternative to debate Golden Dome and tackle such questions. Secretary of Protection Pete Hegseth prohibited collaborating officers from speaking about it there, nevertheless. As well as, media had been barred from attending a separate Golden Dome business summit occasion in Huntsville that was hosted by the Pentagon’s Missile Protection Company (MDA).
David Wright, a Massachusetts Institute of Expertise physicist and arms management knowledgeable, views this ongoing lack of transparency as one among many ominous warning indicators. “The Pentagon has carried out a number of issues not too long ago to lower oversight of this method,” he says. He cites Hegseth’s gutting of the workplace that may have overseen Golden Dome testing, in addition to this system’s exemption from ordinary “fly before you purchase” guidelines meant to attenuate spending on pie-in-the-sky acquisitions. With out these guardrails, Wright says, “you possibly can find yourself losing some huge cash by constructing stuff that doesn’t work.”
The technical problem of capturing down only one intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) is excessive, usually in contrast with hitting a bullet with a bullet.
Within the Eighties then president Ronald Reagan established the Strategic Protection Initiative (SDI)—extra generally known as the “Star Wars” program—to do exactly that at unprecedented scales. SDI envisioned deploying space-based interceptors and directed power weapons to defend the U.S. in opposition to nuclear annihilation by barrages of Soviet ICBMs. However Reagan’s formidable initiative was panned by critics as ruinously costly and basically unworkable. It fizzled out quickly after the chilly battle ended, though the Pentagon has maintained extra modest multibillion-dollar missile protection packages ever since.
On September 3 of this yr, Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts criticized Trump’s declare that he could be “finishing the job” that Reagan began. As a substitute, Markey mentioned on the Senate ground, “what it’s going to actually do is bury arms management, balloon the deficit, and enhance the underside traces of billionaires.” He additionally mentioned the federal government owes it to taxpayers “to have a plan, to know the way a lot it’s going to value and to make sure that it’s going to work.” On the opposite facet, congressional proponents resembling Consultant Dale Sturdy of Alabama fashioned a Golden Dome caucus to advance the venture. “With nuclear-capable adversaries throughout the globe, we are able to’t afford for this imaginative and prescient to not turn out to be a actuality,” Sturdy mentioned in a press release in June.
The physics of missile protection haven’t modified since SDI’s demise—however the world has, together with its arsenals. The place as soon as strategic bombardment by Russian nukes was the first concern, now a strong protection should account for a lot of extra attainable adversaries and eventualities—long-range missiles from China or North Korea, midrange strikes by Iran on U.S. belongings all through the Center East and the opportunity of unconventional drone assaults from state and nonstate actors throughout the globe.
Missile protection know-how has modified, too, turning into extra superior and efficient. “Hit-to-kill know-how has gotten ok that you just can hit a bullet with a bullet, underneath good circumstances, a reasonably excessive proportion of the time,” Wright says. The interceptors of Israel’s Iron Dome, for example, reportedly stopped some 85 % of ballistic missiles and drones launched in retaliatory strikes by Iran throughout a battle between these nations in June.
That hit charge is technologically spectacular, however as Wright argued in a latest paper, it’s unlikely to translate into success for Golden Dome. In these June exchanges, Iron Dome was defending a small space, concerning the dimension of New Jersey, in opposition to a lone adversary’s typical medium-range missiles that deployed few, if any, significant countermeasures. It is a far cry from Golden Dome’s rather more tough normal objective of defending the U.S. homeland from all manners of missiles from a large number of countries, together with ones carrying nuclear warheads and augmented by any variety of refined countermeasures, resembling radar jammers, missile-mimicking decoys and clouds of ejected chaff.
Interceptors from Israel’s Iron Dome system streak via the skies to defend in opposition to a barrage of ballistic missiles launched by Iran on June 21, 2025.
Eli Basri/SOPA Photographs/LightRocket through Getty Photographs
Doubtlessly including to the issue, in August Canada agreed to hitch Golden Dome, additional increasing the territory meant to fall underneath the system’s safety. Golden Dome’s scope additionally could or could not embody Alaska and Hawaii, in addition to Guam and numerous worldwide websites internet hosting U.S. army services. Past these myriad uncertainties, Pentagon officers additionally haven’t revealed the “effectiveness” they intend to attain, referring to the fraction of incoming missiles Golden Dome could be designed to intercept.
Whereas particulars could also be missing, the MDA has outlined broad contours of a multilayer design for Golden Dome, in accordance with slides reportedly entitled “Go Quick, Suppose Large!” that had been introduced on the Huntsville business summit. The design features a house layer, present regional missile protection programs (resembling Terminal Excessive Altitude Space Protection, or THAAD) and protection centered on high-value places, and all of those parts must be by some means built-in with one another.
“You’re not going to have one functionality that may mitigate all of the threats,” says Clayton Swope, deputy director of the Aerospace Safety Challenge on the Middle for Strategic & Worldwide Research, which receives some funding from Lockheed Martin and different potential contractors. However basically it stays unclear what kind Golden Dome will take, he says. “Till we reply that query, a whole lot of the professionals and cons can’t actually be debated, together with ‘Is it value it?’”
Area-based interceptors don’t exist but, nevertheless it’s attainable to deploy satellites into low-Earth orbit that would launch their very own shortly maneuvering projectiles into the trail of an incoming missile, ram into it and harm or destroy it, says Laura Grego, a safety and house coverage knowledgeable on the Union of Involved Scientists. Past these, a lot of the applied sciences that might be notional parts of Golden Dome are already out there. In concept, the missile protection system’s layers would complement each other, for instance, in opposition to an incoming ICBM: one sort of interceptor might goal it through the enhance section, when the missile could be rising after takeoff; others might take goal through the midcourse section; and others might accomplish that through the terminal section, because the missile descended towards its goal.
Researchers have studied missile protection for many years. In accordance with a 2012 report from the Nationwide Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Drugs, the parts of the present midcourse missile protection system—together with antiballistic interceptors based mostly in Alaska and California—“have shortcomings that restrict their effectiveness in opposition to even modestly improved threats,” and the system is “poor with respect to all” elementary rules of an economical protection. Moreover, a essential American Bodily Society report launched in March 2025 identified that boost-phase missile protection is thwarted if an ICBM isn’t detected with confidence inside 45 seconds or if its trajectory shouldn’t be nicely understood inside one other 20 seconds. There may be little room for error.
However, what’s difficult isn’t the tech however the economics, Grego says, as a result of it’s comparatively straightforward for attackers to evade or overwhelm the protection.
Fielding extra ICBMs or augmenting them with countermeasures, for instance, is affordable in contrast with the price of constructing any conceivable missile protection system. To guard in opposition to one or two slow-moving ICBMs, which might launch from many alternative websites, a whole lot of interceptors could be wanted; for fast-moving missiles, 1000’s could be required to make sure a excessive probability of interception. And just like the Starlink satellite tv for pc constellations that present lightning-fast world broadband Web protection, Golden Dome’s fleet of interceptors in low-Earth orbit would regularly decay with out common (and costly) replenishment as atmospheric drag pulled particular person spacecraft again all the way down to fiery reentries.
This all however ensures that space-based missile protection could be Golden Dome’s most costly layer by far, probably costing greater than $1 trillion, in accordance with that 2012 report.
For its half, a report launched in Could by the Congressional Funds Workplace calculated $831 billion as a excessive estimate for the entire value of Golden Dome’s interceptor constellation over 20 years. The price of launching quite a few spacecraft might decline by some 30 % within the coming years, the report acknowledged, due to improvements from firms resembling SpaceX, Rocket Lab and Blue Origin. However specialists warning such market traits in all probability gained’t translate right into a considerably cheaper Golden Dome. “Take that [30 percent figure] with a grain of salt. The federal government shouldn’t be seeing this huge lower in launch prices,” says Bonnie Triezenberg, a senior engineer on the nonprofit assume tank RAND, which receives a few of its funding from protection and nationwide safety companies.
No matter value, any space-based system would even be very susceptible to counterattack, Grego factors out, with every compromised spacecraft creating a niche within the missile-defense satellite tv for pc constellation; just one nuclear-tipped missile slipping via to strike its goal could be sufficient to trigger disaster. “Within the rush to lift their arms and say, ‘I’ll assist construct this,’ nobody’s requiring a solution to these primary questions: How do you retain it protected? How do you make it economical?”
It’s not simply the Pentagon trying to late 2028 as a make-or-break second for Golden Dome; the U.S. aerospace business is as nicely. Lockheed Martin is focusing on that yr for a demonstration of a space-based interceptor for the system, though no industrial contracts have but been inked. Different protection contractors search to hitch the venture as nicely: Northrop Grumman is increasing its missile protection manufacturing capability in Alabama—close to Huntsville, the relocated headquarters of U.S. Area Command—and L3Harris is increasing its satellite tv for pc integration and check facility in Florida. Raytheon, Boeing and Leidos are all gearing up for potential high-dollar contracts, too.
Some specialists, resembling Victoria Samson of the Safe World Basis, are skeptical of those deadlines. In any case, throughout President Trump’s first time period, his administration set the Artemis moon program in movement and deliberate to land a crew on the moon by 2024. That mission continues to be years away, and this system’s future is unsure.
On July 22 Area Power Normal Michael Guetlein, head of Golden Dome, acknowledged that he had a 60-day deadline to current an “structure” for this system. Samson, Triezenberg and different specialists don’t count on such a blueprint to truly current many new particulars, and it could merely contain present missile protection programs.
Grego raises a further concern: even when Golden Dome’s space-based interceptors can’t neutralize the specter of ICBMs, they will nonetheless do rather more than shoot down missiles. Interceptors can be utilized, for example, to focus on rivals’ spacecraft, resulting in a strategically destabilizing “extra overt weaponization of house, which turns into extraordinarily harmful,” she says.
Dealing with an escalating orbital arms race, adversaries might search to reset the stability of energy by eliminating interceptors and different space-based belongings en masse—one thing most successfully carried out through a nuclear detonation in house. Provided that the only remaining nuclear treaty between the U.S. and Russia is set to run out in February 2026 and that house weaponry is scarcely talked about in present arms management accords, any missile-defense orbital armada might additionally represent a flash level for world thermonuclear battle.
The threadbare standing of worldwide arms management agreements could also be one cause for the U.S. authorities’s growing funding in missile protection, Wright says. “When politicians get requested what they’re going to do concerning the risk, if you happen to’re not doing arms management and also you don’t know what else you may do, the simplest factor to say is ‘We’re going to spend cash on protection.’”
A special query fully is whether or not the American public would really be nicely served by a missile protection initiative that would probably devour greater than $1 trillion of taxpayer cash and end result within the militarization of low-Earth orbit. So long as the Trump administration stays nebulous concerning the plan and its true value, its clearest end result might be the perilous acceleration of arms races and the enrichment of profit-seeking protection and space-tech contractors for what’s, at greatest, solely the phantasm of security.
