The Federal Supreme Courtroom of the UAE has partially overturned a earlier judgment within the high-profile “Terrorist Justice and Dignity Organisation” case, issuing life sentences to 24 defendants for collaborating with and financing the Al-Islah Terrorist Organisation.
The courtroom sentenced the defendants to life imprisonment for collaborating with the “Terrorist Justice and Dignity Organisation,” and offering funds to the “Al-Islah Terrorist Organisation,”, along with ordering the confiscation of all funds and objects seized in reference to these crimes.
Lawyer Common, Chancellor Dr. Hamad Saif Al Shamsi, had partially appealed the appellate courtroom’s ruling that dismissed the felony case in opposition to the defendants for collaborating with the “Terrorist Justice and Dignity Organisation” and financing the “Al-Islah Terrorist Group,” citing their prior trial in Case No. 79 of 2012 – State Safety.
UAE courts
The Lawyer Common argued that the ruling was legally flawed in its utility of the regulation, and will subsequently be overturned.
He emphasised that the courtroom ought to have utilized the penalties prescribed for the extra critical offences of financing and collaborating with a terrorist organisation, whereas accounting for any portion of the sentence already served underneath the earlier ruling.
The courtroom’s choice to dismiss the felony case for these two offenses primarily based on a closing ruling issued in Case No. 79 of 2012 – State Safety Crimes – was misplaced.
The prior judgement solely convicted the defendants of a single crime, specifically the institution and administration of the “Al-Islah Group” as stipulated in Article 180/1 of the Penal Code, and didn’t tackle the separate crimes of financing a terrorist organisation and collaborating with it, each of that are stipulated in Federal Legislation No. 1 of 2004 on Combating Terrorist Crimes, and carry unbiased and extra extreme penalties.
The Federal Supreme Courtroom reviewed the Lawyer Common’s attraction, and in its session on Thursday, June 26, dominated to partially overturn the judgment and reconvict 24 defendants, sentencing them to life imprisonment.
The courtroom primarily based its choice on the clear authorized distinction between the incidents within the two circumstances, which invalidates any declare that they share the identical trigger or subject material.
Every incident constitutes an unbiased felony act topic to its personal punishment underneath the regulation.
Accordingly, the earlier ruling in Case No. 79 of 2012 – State Safety Crimes – doesn’t carry authorized weight that might stop the prosecution of the defendants for the costs of financing and collaboration within the current case.
For the reason that challenged judgment ignored this precept and dismissed the felony case primarily based on the prior ruling, regardless of the distinction in trigger and subject material, the judgment erred in its utility of the regulation.
This necessitated the partial overturning of those particular prices, restricted to the defendants named within the Lawyer Common’s attraction.
The State Safety Chamber of the Abu Dhabi Federal Courtroom of Enchantment had beforehand convicted, in Case No. 87 of 2023, identified publicly because the “Terrorist Justice and Dignity Group” case, 53 defendants who have been leaders and members of the terrorist Muslim Brotherhood group, along with six firms.
Sentences ranged from life and short-term imprisonment to fines totalling AED20m ($5.4m), whereas one defendant was acquitted.
Following Thursday’s ruling by the State Safety Chamber of the Federal Supreme Courtroom, the overall variety of convicted people on this case has risen to 83 out of 84 referred to trial.
