As U.S. President Donald Trump continues to threaten annexing Greenland, specialists are warning the way forward for the North Atlantic Treaty Group (NATO) — of which Canada is a member — is at stake.
Hours earlier than the international ministers of Greenland and Denmark had been set to fulfill high U.S. officers within the White Home on Wednesday, Trump took to his social media platform Fact Social to push for U.S. management over the island.
“NATO turns into way more formidable and efficient with Greenland within the palms of the UNITED STATES,” Trump wrote. “Something lower than that’s unacceptable.”
Greenland is an autonomous territory of the Kingdom of Denmark, which is a member of the NATO navy alliance. Final week, Trump hinted at potential motion.
“If we don’t do it the simple manner we’re going to do it the exhausting manner,” he mentioned.
Article 5 is likely one of the core ideas of the 76-year-old navy alliance and states that “an armed assault towards one NATO member shall be thought of an assault towards all members, and triggers an obligation for every member to return to its help.”
The one time the article has ever been invoked has been after the terrorist assaults of Sept. 11, 2001.
The alliance has by no means needed to take care of one member attacking one other.
“Though NATO has survived tensions between its members prior to now, there isn’t any precedent for an precise inside assault,” mentioned Nicole Covey, a fellow on the Canadian World Affairs Institute.
Get day by day Nationwide information
Get the day’s high information, political, financial, and present affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox as soon as a day.
“In any case, there’s this established norm that allies will not be purported to assault one another in the event that they wish to preserve any type of constructive tie,” she added.
It’s unlikely that the alliance would survive if the U.S., the de facto chief of the alliance, assaults one other member, mentioned Gaëlle Rivard-Piché, govt director of the CDA Institute.
“I feel if the USA assault a NATO ally, it’s going be the tip of the alliance. I don’t see how the alliance would survive such an occasion. I don’t foresee a navy invasion, however who is aware of, proper?” she mentioned.
Since Trump has ratcheted up the rhetoric, a number of NATO allies, together with Canada, have come out in assist of Denmark and Greenland, with some European nations on Wednesday asserting they’re sending troops to Greenland to bolster Arctic safety.
Whereas Prime Minister Mark Carney has mentioned Gov. Gen. Mary Simon will go to at an unclear date, it’s not clear at the moment whether or not any Canadian troops could be a part of that effort.
World Information has reached out to the Canadian Forces.
However Carney has famous lately that NATO can present safety for the Danish territory because the alliance does for all members.
“We’re companions in NATO. It’s a mutual defence alliance. We are able to present that safety. As NATO, we are able to present safety for all of NATO, Greenland included,” Prime Minister Carney mentioned to reporters on the Canadian embassy in Paris final week.
“The way forward for Greenland is a call for Greenland and Denmark completely — it’s their determination.”
The response by each NATO and EU leaders is “anticipated,” Covey mentioned.
“Greenland is being threatened by the USA and it will injury the credibility of each the EU and NATO management if they didn’t overtly assist Greenland,” she mentioned.
Nonetheless, member states additionally need to stroll the tightrope of not offending Trump, Rivard-Piché mentioned.
“It’s the stick and the carrot, however their stick is just not very huge,” she mentioned, including that the U.S. nonetheless shoulders the single-largest share of the NATO finances.
In accordance with the Atlantic Council, the U.S. spends $928 billion on its defence finances, almost twice that of Europe and Canada mixed.
For Canada and its allies, years of reliance on the U.S. has weakened their very own defence capabilities for a situation resembling this, Rivard-Piché mentioned.
“That was a warranted criticism in direction of Canada and the truth that we simply didn’t make investments as a lot in defence over the previous few a long time, however now we have to step up,” she mentioned.
In June, Canada joined different NATO nations in pledging 5 per cent of its finances on defence spending by 2035. A big section of that’s more likely to go in direction of strengthening Canada’s capabilities within the Arctic, Rivard-Piché mentioned.
“We’re investing in our tech capabilities to extend our all-domain situational consciousness from the seabed to house. We’re investing in superior expertise and underwater expertise, in order that we are able to really monitor the area and know what’s occurring,” she mentioned.
Denmark has mentioned Trump’s declare of imminent threats towards Greenland from Russia and China’s will not be correct.
“Saying that the area is crawling with Chinese language and Russian ships is simply not reflective of the fact,” Rivard-Piché mentioned.
The potential for a navy confrontation in Greenland is “extraordinarily distant” however “not zero,” Covey mentioned.
“Rationally, a navy confrontation in Greenland between NATO allies ought to be unthinkable, however the Trump administration has already demonstrated that they’re prepared to behave in an unpredictable method,” she mentioned.
© 2026 World Information, a division of Corus Leisure Inc.
