The California DMV is going through a lawsuit introduced on behalf of almost 20,000 immigrant truckers over the state’s plans to revoke their business drivers’ licenses (CDLs).
The Asian Legislation Caucus and the Sikh Coalition, together with the regulation agency Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, filed the lawsuit on Tuesday in an effort to cease the California DMV from canceling the CDLs, which the grievance says would “end in mass work stoppages” beginning Jan 5, 2026.
“This class-action lawsuit is introduced on behalf of the Jakara Motion and 5 business drivers who’ve been disadvantaged of their rights and livelihoods,” a joint assertion from the Asian Legislation Caucus and Sikh Coalition stated. “In keeping with experiences from the San Francisco Chronicle and KQED, California state officers communicated they’d start reissuing licenses on December 17. Regardless of these public assurances, the state has neither reissued any of the contested licenses nor created a course of to treatment the date challenge with no indication that it plans to take action earlier than January 5.”
The lawsuit alleges that on Nov. 6, the California DMV notified 17,299 immigrant drivers and enterprise house owners that their non-domiciled CDLs could be canceled on Jan. 5, 2026, attributable to an error with the expiration date of the licenses.
An identical letter was despatched to an extra 2,700 drivers in December, informing them that their licenses could be canceled in mid-February.
The DMV is required to set the expiration date for a CDL given to an immigrant on both the identical day or earlier than the expiration of the motive force’s work authorization or authorized presence paperwork, in line with the lawsuit.
Nevertheless, the lawsuit alleges that the DMV letters violated California process, which might require the division to both cancel the license with out prejudice or change the expiration date.
“For all 19,999 immigrants, the DMV intends to cancel their business licenses with out affording any alternative to acquire a corrected license or to contest the cancellation,” the lawsuit reads.
The submitting additional states that “regardless of its personal regulation, the DMV didn’t persistently be certain that a CDL’s expiration date matched the top of an individual’s interval of labor authorization or lawful presence.”
In November, after a heated forwards and backwards between the federal authorities and California, the Division of Transportation (DOT) introduced that the Golden State was planning to revoke 17,000 non-domiciled CDLs.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s workplace pushed again on the DOT’s assertion that his state “admitted to illegally issuing” the licenses.
Nevertheless, in line with the lawsuit, notices had been despatched to greater than the reported 17,000 drivers.
The lawsuit notes that the cancellation of the CDLs has a far-reaching impression past the drivers themselves, saying that the drivers “play an indispensable position in our native and nationwide economies, offering important companies that communities depend on on daily basis, together with transporting meals, driving kids to highschool and delivering manufactured items.”
“The sudden lack of their means to work threatens not solely their livelihoods but in addition the soundness of our provide chains and companies on which the general public relies upon. Neither the people nor our communities can maintain the hurt that can happen if these drivers lose their licenses, careers, and financial stability,” the lawsuit reads.
The lawsuit describes a few of the plaintiffs’ experiences after receiving the November letter.
In a single occasion, a plaintiff recognized as John Doe 4 allegedly acquired the letter even supposing his CDL expires on the identical day as his work authorization, the very doc he supposedly used to resume the license.
The lawsuit claims that there are recipients of cancellation letters whose CDLs are seemingly in compliance.
In one other occasion, a member of Jakara Motion — which describes itself as a “grassroots community-building group working to empower, educate, and arrange working-class Punjabi Sikhs, and different marginalized communities” — tried to deal with his issues in regards to the cancellation by going to a DMV workplace in particular person.
The lawsuit claims that when the Jakara member arrived on the DMV workplace, he was “pressured into surrendering his CDL, out of concern that his non-commercial driver’s license would already be cancelled.”
Additional, the lawsuit claims that the “DMV has not defined the way it recognized 19,999 licenses as out of compliance with state regulation and the way it can be certain that its determinations are correct.”
The lawsuit is looking on the choose to challenge a writ of mandate, preliminary injunction or everlasting injunction that may require the California DMV to make sure that the plaintiffs and those who fall beneath the category motion are in a position to receive a corrected CDL “with out interruption to their driving privileges.”
The Trump administration launched a crackdown on the CDL issuing course of as a part of its efforts to sort out unlawful immigration. The transfer got here after a collection of deadly crashes involving non-domiciled CDL holders.
The California DMV and Newsom’s workplace didn’t instantly reply to Fox Information Digital’s requests for remark.
