- AMD Threadripper Professional 9995WX outpaces Intel Xeon W9-3495X considerably in Premiere Professional benchmarks
- Video enhancing PC workloads profit from AMD’s increased core density and sustained throughput
- Measured positive aspects in DaVinci Resolve and After Results spotlight Threadripper’s content material creation power
AMD’s Threadripper PRO 9000WX collection has delivered a blow that Intel’s Xeon workstation CPUs could not get better from.
Benchmarks from Puget Programs protecting real-world content material creation functions discovered the brand new Threadripper chips outperformed Intel’s Xeon W-3500 collection throughout practically each class, usually by huge margins which left little room for excuses or rebuttal.
On the high of AMD’s stack is the 96-core 9995WX, priced at $11,700, delivering a Cinebench 2024 multi-core rating of seven,508, 27% forward of the previous-gen 7995WX and a staggering 125% quicker than Intel’s strongest Xeon examined.
Threadripper pulls forward?
Even AMD’s mid-range 9975WX with 32 cores ($4,100) routinely beat Intel’s 60-core w9-3595X in workloads like Blender, DaVinci Resolve, and Unreal Engine compiling.
Intel’s greatest merely couldn’t sustain, both in uncooked throughput or clock pace, and sometimes appeared inefficient by comparability.
In Photoshop, the place excessive single-core pace issues, AMD’s 16-core 9955WX got here out on high with an total rating of 11,384 – whereas Intel’s Xeon w5-3535X managed solely 6,801, barely 60% of AMD’s greatest exhibiting.
Even the weakest Threadripper 9000 chip examined outperformed each Intel CPU throughout the board in Adobe’s suite of artistic instruments, together with Premiere Professional and After Results.
In After Results 3D workloads, the 9955WX once more dominated with a 9% lead over the 9995WX and a 40% benefit over Intel’s high performer.
DaVinci Resolve additional emphasised Intel’s drawback: the 9975WX scored 180 in Intraframe processing, a ten% enchancment over AMD’s earlier technology, whereas Xeons lagged by greater than 20%.
AI-related benchmarks utilizing LLaMA.cpp confirmed constant scaling on AMD, with the 9995WX processing 16% extra tokens per second than its predecessor.
Intel’s Xeon elements trailed even lower-tier Threadripper fashions right here, additional underlining their inefficiency in trendy workloads.
Workstation duties like compiling in Visible Studio or shader constructing in Unreal Engine confirmed predictable tendencies.
The 9995WX and 9985WX accomplished these duties dramatically quicker, with the previous ending Unreal Engine compilation in 68% of the time required by the earlier technology.
Intel’s Xeons merely couldn’t compete; even their 60-core chip was outpaced by AMD’s 32-core providing.
Whereas AMD’s new processors include a ten–20% worth improve over the 7000WX line, the efficiency uplift and DDR5-6400 help assist justify it.
In practically each check, AMD’s dominance was clear and systematic, leaving Intel’s Xeon collection trying outdated and overpriced.
