Charles Blakey has lived in a haunted home all his life. Within the household for eight generations, the sprawling abode in chilly Sag Harbor is the Blakey crown jewel: stunning, massive, and all theirs. And, unquestionably, unhealthy issues have occurred there, an concept that first-time characteristic filmmaker Nadia Latif stretches (and streeetcchhhhesss) to wild ends in “The Man in My Basement,” her bold if scattershot adaptation of the Walter Mosley novel.
Whereas readability isn’t all the time required for a undertaking as thorny as this one, cohesion is. That may run in brief provide, and shortly.
We all know the home has gotten into Charles’ (Corey Hawkins) blood and, when the movie opens, it’s just about all has has left. He’s obtained no cash, no job, no household, and barely any mates — particulars that Latif delivers with type, smarts, and loads of pressure within the movie’s elegant first act. Charles’ isolation seems to be not solely self-imposed, but in addition a part of an even bigger (and, frankly, fairly daring) swing in relation to character-building: He’s not simply somebody who’s haunted or has made errors. He’s a unhealthy particular person.
When he goes to see his cousin on the native financial institution, she received’t even let him within the constructing. She opts to have a tricky dialog outdoors, one that features her fierce declaration that Charles “obtained what he requested for.” Later, when he calls his Aunt Peaches to ask for money, her rush of breath and the “…oh” she exhales when she realizes who’s on the opposite finish of the road inform us every little thing we have to know. He needles his mates. He pushes folks away, shoves them by pressure. He doesn’t have a lot to contribute to the world, and he’s definitely not making an attempt to vary that.
What he does have, nonetheless, is a basement. An enormous one.
Set in 1994 and kitted out with loads of period-appropriate particulars, the movie’s setting permits for all kinds of thriller (and one, fairly humorous, rudimentary web search). When the smiling Anniston Bennet (Willem Dafoe) arrives on Charles’ doorstep in the future, asking if he may hire out his “stand-up basement” for a few months, we already know that he actually wants the money. However does Anniston? And, actually, what does he know? How does he understand it? Why does he understand it?
These questions — and extra, so very many extra — pile up over the course of the movie’s working time (almost 115 minutes, and also you’ll really feel each one). Whereas Charles initially balks at Anniston’s provide (maybe the one time the viewers can be with him in relation to his decisions and reactions), it sticks with him. When he begins clearing out that basement — both to create space for Bennet or to search out stuff to promote, it’s by no means fairly defined — we all know what’s coming subsequent. In any case, it’s within the movie’s title.
When Anniston finally gives Charles $65,000 for 2 months (!) in mentioned basement, you nearly can’t blame him for going for it. Even the creaky visions that begin to plague him, the terrifying nightmares (bounce scares ahoy, and so a lot of them low-cost) can’t dissuade Charles from taking over Anniston on the provide. Certain, stranger, come dwell in my basement for 2 months and for a thousand bucks a day, why not? This could be the final time we perceive something Charles does.
When Anniston strikes in, Latif and cinematographer Ula Pontikos make these early interactions really matter. Charles will get boxed in by the digital camera, which gazes up at Anniston with close to reverence. A cut up diopter shot is nearly all for present, however that doesn’t detract from its talent. Alas, regardless of its intriguing and well-mounted first act, issues backside out and quick.
Contemplate the introduction of Narciss Gully (Anna Diop), who arrives early to take a look at Charles’ many intriguing household artifacts. Narciss, a curator and historian who doesn’t simply know her stuff in relation to African historical past, however really values it, initially balks at Charles, who largely appears pushed to promote this “junk” for revenue. However when Charles (perhaps) has a change of coronary heart, he turns jittery, stuttering, and odd — after which reveals up at Narciss’ quilt store to pitch her on an concept that ought to dispel any notions of what sort of particular person he’s. And but, she doesn’t absolutely flip away from him. Why?
Maybe that’s the important thing to what unfolds elsewhere. When Anniston reveals a part of his grand plan to Charles, he doesn’t absolutely flip away from him, both. However why? Whereas Mosley’s ebook was way more involved with the overtly racial parts of the lads’s discount — with Charles’ advanced household historical past, together with fascinating particulars about how Blakeys had been by no means enslaved, taking part in a a lot bigger half — Latif’s model piles on all kinds of different parts, muddling the ability of Mosley’s unique story.
That Anniston’s provide is tainted is a given; that Charles is making a cope with a really unhealthy man is apparent. Nevertheless, the satan isn’t simply on the display, it’s within the particulars, and Latif’s movie can’t pull these collectively.
Grade: C+
“The Man in My Basement” premiered on the 2025 Toronto Worldwide Movie Competition. Andscape will launch it in theaters on Friday, September 12, with a streaming launch on Hulu to comply with.
Need to keep updated on IndieWire’s movie critiques and demanding ideas? Subscribe right here to our newly launched e-newsletter, In Evaluate by David Ehrlich, during which our Chief Movie Critic and Head Opinions Editor rounds up the most effective new critiques and streaming picks together with some unique musings — all solely obtainable to subscribers.
