Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell defended his division’s dealing with of latest protests, saying officers acted appropriately to quell unrest — pushing again in opposition to criticism about aggressive crowd management techniques used throughout demonstrations in opposition to President Trump’s immigration crackdown.
McDonnell mentioned in an announcement launched Monday that the division would conduct a “complete analysis of every use-of-force incident.” The chief mentioned the LAPD wouldn’t shrink back from scrutiny — and would take motion in opposition to any officer “who has fallen quick” of the division’s requirements.
The assertion referenced a Instances article printed over the weekend that included accounts from protesters injured by LAPD officers who fired arduous foam projectiles and different so-called less-lethal munitions. The conduct of police models mounted on horseback throughout the protests has additionally confronted scrutiny after video footage confirmed folks being trampled and hit with batons.
McDonnell, who has repeatedly declined interview requests, mentioned the story “incorporates severe accusations, and I don’t take them frivolously.”
He mentioned what was lacking from the general public narrative was the “harmful, fluid and finally violent circumstances our officers encountered.” Whereas the protests have “most frequently been marked by peaceable expression,” he mentioned, at instances they’ve been “hijacked by violence, vandalism, and felony aggression.”
“When demonstrators started throwing objects, setting fires, and refusing to disperse after repeated lawful orders got, officers had been justified in taking swift and measured motion to stop additional hurt and restore public security,” McDonnell mentioned.
The chief’s assertion cited quite a few “documented” instances by which officers had been “violently attacked” with bottles, bricks, Molotov cocktails and commercial-grade fireworks. Fifty-two officers suffered accidents that required medical remedy, he mentioned.
The division’s critics, he mentioned, had been utilizing “edited video clips or anecdotal accounts as definitive proof of misconduct.”
McDonnell disputed the allegation that officers failed to provide dispersal orders earlier than firing hard-foam projectiles or tear gasoline, saying demonstrators got discover to depart in each English and Spanish — “utilizing ground-level amplified methods or, when vital, by helicopter.”
He additionally denied officers used drive indiscriminately, saying actions in opposition to protesters had been “focused, proportional, and made in direct response to fast, credible threats.”
However quite a few eyewitness accounts from protesters — together with a number of video clips which have gone viral on-line in latest weeks — increase questions on whether or not LAPD officers used drive on individuals who posed no menace.
After paying out thousands and thousands over the past decade for protest-related lawsuits, the division once more doubtless faces a wave of civil litigation by plaintiffs alleging extreme drive.
A coalition of press rights organizations filed a lawsuit earlier this month that described journalists being shot with less-lethal police rounds, tear-gassed and detained with out trigger by LAPD officers throughout the protests.
John Burton, an legal professional who’s representing three injured protesters — together with one whose testicle was ruptured by a foam projectile — mentioned that video footage from the demonstrations exhibits officers routinely flouting state laws that govern crowd management techniques.
“Have these folks realized nothing?” Burton mentioned. “We went by way of this with George Floyd and what number of instances earlier than.”
