Suggestions is New Scientist’s in style sideways take a look at the newest science and know-how information. You may submit objects you consider could amuse readers to Suggestions by emailing suggestions@newscientist.com
Sunset showdown
Suggestions has been dimly conscious for some time that there’s a slew of AI-generated music swamping platforms like Spotify. Our consciousness was restricted, we confess, as a result of we’re so outdated that we nonetheless favor to hearken to CDs.
Nonetheless, we weren’t too stunned when New Scientist‘s Timothy Revell informed us about an indie rock band known as The Velvet Sunset that seems to be totally AI-generated, from their songs, which sound just like the beige love-children of Coldplay and the Eagles, to their uncanny-valley Instagram pictures, which appear like rejected idea artwork from Daisy Jones & the Six.
First, the band denied this. On their X account, The Velvet Sunset claimed it was “Completely loopy that so-called ‘journalists’ preserve pushing the lazy, baseless principle that The Velvet Sunset is ‘AI-generated’ with zero proof”, and that “That is our music, written in lengthy, sweaty nights in a cramped bungalow in California”.
But there is no such thing as a video of them, and not one of the members has any on-line presence. Issues appeared clear after Rolling Stone interviewed the band’s “creator” Andrew Frelon, who stated it was all an “artwork hoax”. However then Frelon claimed that was itself a lie, and the “band” posted a assertion denying any involvement with him. By this level, Suggestions was bored of redrafting our redrafts, so we simply need to say we don’t know what’s happening, and in addition we don’t give two hoots.
As an alternative, we’re going to run with Tim’s suggestion that, in case you type an AI band, “you must totally embrace it”. Don’t give your self a reputation that feels like one thing Lou Reed would give you if he ever moved someplace sunny. Lean in. Tim suggests the next artist names: Rage I’m a Machine, The Bitles and TL(LM)C. Suggestions want to add Pink Floppy Disc, Lana DEL Array, Captchatonia, Alanis Microsoft and Velvet Username.
Lastly, this new collective of artists will should be spoofed, by a performer known as Bizarre AI Yankovic.
Sodom bomb
The wheels of science grind exceedingly slowly, however they do sometimes crush one thing into mud. And so it’s that Scientific Reviews has retracted a fairly intriguing research from September 2021, which claimed to have discovered archaeological proof for a cataclysmic occasion that impressed the biblical story of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Within the story, the 2 cities are destroyed by God due to some not-entirely-specified sins. In distinction, the research proposed a “Tunguska sized airburst“: a meteorite exploding in mid-air, inflicting devastation, alongside the traces of the 1908 explosion above Siberia often called the Tunguska occasion.
It claimed this occurred about 3600 years in the past and wrecked the Bronze Age metropolis of Tall el-Hammam in present-day Jordan. Proof included “a city-wide ~1.5-m-thick carbon-and-ash-rich destruction layer”, “soot” and “melted platinum, iridium, nickel, gold, silver, zircon, chromite, and quartz”.
Besides, maybe not. On 24 April, the journal pulled the paper, citing “errors in methodology, analyses, and interpretation” and “errors propagated from the unique sources [about the Tunguska blast]”. This adopted 4 years of criticism and a number of corrections, all documented by the great folks at Retraction Watch. A number of dozen photos had been manipulated in an “inappropriate” method, and the burned and melted supplies could possibly be from smelting, fairly than a mid-air explosion – given Tall el-Hammam was, we repeat, a Bronze Age metropolis.
Suggestions was notably impressed by a remark left on the dialogue board PubPeer by a Michael J. I. Brown: “The north arrow and shadows in Determine 44C point out that the Solar is roughly north-north-east, which isn’t attainable on the Lifeless Sea.” This can be a stage of educated pedantry to which we will solely aspire.
So, briefly, somebody wrote a paper a few pair of famously debauched cities, manipulated photos in ways in which went in opposition to the principles and didn’t correctly contemplate an apparent various clarification for his or her findings. How sinful.
Avocadon’t
Suggestions will get an terrible lot of press releases, and to be sincere, we ignore over 90 per cent of them. That is partly as a result of we get added to a number of irrelevant lists, just like the time we bought months’ value of messages about new wedding ceremony costume designs. However the largest issue is that almost all are simply boring.
Not so the message that popped up in our inbox on 2 July, with the topic line “Avocados Are Not the Enemy”. The press launch pertains to the beginning of the Wimbledon tennis match and the choice to cease serving avocados there – apparently as a part of ongoing efforts to grow to be extra sustainable. Ditching avocados, the message says, “perpetuates myths that aren’t backed by present information. In actuality, avocados are one of the nutrient-dense and environmentally accountable fruits obtainable at the moment”.
The press launch goes on to elucidate that avocados have a small water footprint. Moreover, they’re “naturally wealthy in heart-healthy fat, fibre, and vital vitamins” and help small farms in locations like Peru and South Africa.
Wow, we thought, what a vote of confidence. After which we seen that the folks praising avocados so extremely have been from the World Avocado Organisation.
To which we will solely say, citing Rice-Davies, M. (1963): “Effectively, they might, wouldn’t they?”
Bought a narrative for Suggestions?
You may ship tales to Suggestions by e-mail at suggestions@newscientist.com. Please embrace your house handle. This week’s and previous Feedbacks will be seen on our web site.
