The current publication of the College of Edinburgh’s Evaluation of Race and Historical past has drawn consideration to its “cranium room”: a group of 1,500 human craniums procured for examine within the Nineteenth century.
Craniometry, the examine of cranium measurements, was extensively taught in medical faculties throughout Britain, Europe, and the US within the Nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
Right now, the dangerous and racist foundations of craniometry have been discredited. It is lengthy been confirmed that the scale and form of the top haven’t any bearing on psychological and behavioral traits in both people or teams.
Within the Nineteenth and early twentieth century, nevertheless, hundreds of skulls have been amassed to allow analysis and instruction in scientific racism. Edinburgh’s cranium room is certainly not distinctive.
Not like phrenology, a well-liked principle which linked character traits to bumps on the top, craniometry loved widespread scientific assist within the Nineteenth century as a result of it revolved round knowledge assortment and statistics.
Associated: What is the distinction between race and ethnicity?
Craniometrists measured skulls and averaged the outcomes for various inhabitants teams. This knowledge was used to categorise folks into races based mostly on the scale and form of the top. Craniometrical proof was used to elucidate why some peoples have been supposedly extra civilized and developed than others.
The huge accumulation of knowledge drawn from skulls appealed to Victorian scientists who believed within the objectivity of numbers. It equally helped to validate racial prejudice by suggesting that variations amongst peoples have been innate and biologically decided.
Medical historical past
The examine of skulls was central to the event of Nineteenth-century anthropology. However earlier than anthropology was taught at British universities, markers of supposed racial distinction have been studied by anatomists expert in figuring out minute variations in skeletons. The examine of skulls entered the college curriculum by medical faculties, and notably by anatomy departments.
For instance, when Alexander Macalister was appointed as professor of anatomy at Cambridge in 1884, a few of his first lectures have been on “The Race Forms of the Human Cranium.”
Macalister’s annual report for 1892 within the Cambridge College Reporter describes how he had elevated Cambridge’s cranial holdings from 55 to 1,402 specimens. In 1899, he reported the donation of greater than 1,000 historical Egyptian craniums from the archaeologist Flinders Petrie. A lot of Macalister’s cranium assortment stays housed within the college’s Duckworth Laboratory, which was established in 1945.
Because the status of craniometrical analysis elevated, establishments needed to compete for cranial collections as they went available on the market. Statistical accuracy trusted huge collection of craniums being measured to supply consultant “sorts”. This created an elevated demand for human stays.
In 1880, the Royal School of Surgeons bought 1,539 skulls from the non-public assortment of Joseph Barnard Davis. This was added to their current cache of 1,018 craniums to create Britain’s largest craniological assortment. This assortment was largely destroyed in 1941 when the faculty constructing was bombed throughout world battle two. The remaining skulls are now not held by the Royal School of Surgeons.
Oxford’s College Museum of Pure Historical past included rows of crania of their anatomical shows within the Nineteenth century, as did the College of Manchester’s medical college (the medical college is now not on the identical web site). This funding in skulls ensured that racial researchers had sufficient materials to review and use of their educating.
Catalogues stored by universities within the Nineteenth and early twentieth centuries reveal not solely the scale of their cranium collections, but in addition the origin of particular person specimens.
Historic trauma
Some medical faculties, comparable to Edinburgh’s, repurposed skulls procured by phrenological societies earlier within the century to reinforce their holdings. Others, together with Oxford’s, made use of skulls unearthed by archaeologists to conduct racial analysis into the nation’s previous. This analysis tried to hint the actions of Celts, Normans, Saxons, and Scandinavians throughout the British Isles.
But as a result of craniologists needed to seize the complete extent of racial variation, skulls from overseas have been particularly prized. Medical graduates of British universities posted to the colonies despatched overseas bones to their previous professors.
In analysis for my forthcoming ebook on cranium collections, I’ve discovered that Cambridge’s cranial register features a cranium despatched from a former scholar stationed in India. He had plucked it from a cremation web site in Bombay regardless of the outrage of gathered mourners. Brazen grave-robbing and colonial violence have been central to the worldwide community that furnished British universities’ cranium rooms.
The racist ideology that spurred the gathering of skulls 150 years in the past has been utterly discredited. Nonetheless, some anthropologists imagine these bones should still make clear human origins, relations and migrations.
But moral components now equally form institutional insurance policies in direction of human stays. The Pitt Rivers Museum in Oxford took its notorious “shrunken heads” off show in 2020.
More and more, universities and museums have confronted the historic injustices and inter-generational trauma perpetuated by their retention of human stays. For the reason that Nineteen Seventies, Indigenous teams from around the globe have launched campaigns to repatriate their ancestors’ bones. Analysis establishments have develop into more and more responsive to those requests.
In London, the Museum of the Royal School of Surgeons now not shows the skeleton of Charles Byrne, the so-called “Irish Large”. Byrne had explicitly denied consent for his stays to be dissected and mounted earlier than he died in 1783.
The skulls in British universities are a testomony to an enormous theft of human stays from virtually each territory on earth. But they’ve the potential to develop into highly effective symbols of reconciliation if their discriminatory histories are acknowledged, and remedied by their return.
A spokesperson for the Duckworth Laboratory, College of Cambridge, stated:
“We, like many establishments within the UK, are coping with the legacies and previous unethical follow in assembling the collections in our care. The Duckworth Assortment and the Division of Archaeology are devoted to fostering an open dialogue and constructing sturdy relationships with conventional communities and different stakeholders. This dedication is seen as an integral a part of a steady, reciprocal trade of data, views, and cultural values. The goal isn’t solely to deal with previous inequities but in addition to complement modern tutorial and cultural understanding by a respectful and equal partnership. On this vein, the Duckworth Assortment is actively increasing its work with archival documentation and enhancing our information and database. In essence, the Duckworth Laboratory’s strategy to repatriation and neighborhood engagement is marked by a dedication to openness, inclusivity, and a recognition of the necessity for an ongoing dialogue.”
This edited article is republished from The Dialog underneath a Inventive Commons license. Learn the authentic article.
