Some atoms are steady, whereas others appear to collapse. Lead-208 will most likely final perpetually, whereas the artificial isotope technetium-99 exists for simply hours. The distinction lies within the construction of the atom’s nucleus, with sure “magic numbers” of nuclear particles making some isotopes particularly proof against radioactive decay.
So what are these magic numbers, and why are they so particular?
This stability appears partly related to the mass of the atom, with heavier parts proving much less steady. However within the Forties and ’50s, scientists noticed that lots of the lighter parts additionally had radioactive isotopes; each carbon-14 and potassium-40 endure radioactive decay slowly and are answerable for a lot of the planet’s background radiation.
Intriguingly, these scientists observed that very specific numbers of protons and neutrons appeared to lead to unusually steady nuclei, and these values grew to become generally known as magic numbers.
“The magic numbers are 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82 and 126,” stated David Jenkins, a nuclear physicist on the College of York within the U.Ok. “In case you take the lightest one — two protons and two neutrons — that is the nucleus of the helium atom, and we all know that is a really steady mixture of protons and neutrons.”
Associated: Why is not an atom’s nucleus spherical?
Shell recreation
Helium nuclei, often known as alpha particles, are spontaneously emitted from heavier, unstable atoms as they endure nuclear decay.
“If you concentrate on it, that is very bizarre,” Jenkins stated. “If an atom goes to decay, why does not it lose protons or neutrons one after the other? The reason being that the alpha particle may be very very steady, and that is associated to this concept of magic numbers.”
Different magic nuclei embrace oxygen-16 (eight protons and eight neutrons), calcium-40 (20 protons and 20 neutrons) and lead-208 (82 protons and 126 neutrons), the heaviest steady component identified.
To know these weird observations, physicists proposed the “nuclear shell mannequin,” which attracts parallels with the digital shells used to elucidate the chemical habits of atoms.
“The concept was that protons and neutrons sit in shells, a bit just like the electrons in an atom, and nuclear excitations would contain protons and neutrons leaping up and down between these shells,” Jenkins defined.
Like their electron analogues, these nuclear shells have mounted vitality values generally known as quantized states, and the system is most steady when these shells are utterly stuffed. The precise reasoning behind this can be a complicated mixture of quantum mechanical components, but it surely’s thought that the sturdy pressure — the basic interplay that holds the protons and neutrons collectively within the nucleus — is larger than anticipated per particle in accomplished shells.
Magic numbers are subsequently merely the numbers of particles required to fill every of those nuclear shells, with separate ranges for protons and neutrons. Particular person isotopes can correspondingly be singly magic, with a magic variety of both protons or neutrons (for instance, the primordial isotope iron-56), or doubly magic, with magic numbers of each protons and neutrons (like oxygen-16 and lead-208).
These doubly magic methods are few and much between, however they possess some intriguing quantum properties, Jenkins stated.
“The doubly magic methods have a spherical distribution of matter and cost” — a totally spherical nucleus, he stated. “Most nuclei are deformed and rotate. They’ve a really totally different construction.”
Nobody is aware of how far this mannequin will stretch. Tin-100 — the heaviest doubly magic nucleus, with 50 protons and 50 neutrons — has a half-life of simply 1.2 seconds, whereas unbihexium, the subsequent magic component after lead, has by no means been synthesized. Subsequently, whether or not this magic stability increase might be sufficient to permit scientists so as to add an eighth row to the periodic desk stays an open query.
