[ad_1]
November 26, 2025
3 min learn
Mysterious Fossil Foot Belonged to Historic Human that Lived Alongside ‘Lucy’
Newly recognized bones tie the mysterious Burtele foot to a brand new Australopithecus species that lived alongside Lucy greater than three million years in the past

The Burtele foot (left) and the foot embedded in an overview of a gorilla foot.
Sixteen years in the past a group of anthropologists found 3.4-million-year-old fossilized foot bones in Ethiopia. Whereas they suspected the foot belonged to an historical human that possible lived alongside the species we all know as “Lucy,” Australopithecus afarensis, and not using a cranium or enamel to investigate, they couldn’t ensure.
What they did know is that not like Lucy, which walked upright on arched toes like our personal, the thriller foot had a greedy toe that was tailored for climbing timber.
Now the identical workforce that found the unusual foot have lastly solved the thriller. In a paper printed Wednesday in Nature, the researchers describe different hominin fossils present in the identical space because the appendage, which they nicknamed the Burtele foot. The findings verify that Lucy lived alongside one other hominin species referred to as Australopithecus deyiremeda, which behaved moderately otherwise from its A. afarensis friends.
On supporting science journalism
For those who’re having fun with this text, take into account supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By buying a subscription you’re serving to to make sure the way forward for impactful tales in regards to the discoveries and concepts shaping our world at present.
“It’s a extremely thrilling discovery long-awaited for all of us who’ve been questioning what that loopy foot was,” says College of Missouri anthropologist Carol Ward, who was not concerned within the new research.
“Not solely do we’ve got completely different species dwelling at fairly related instances in an analogous space however they’re navigating the world otherwise from each other,” she says.

The Burtele foot with its components within the anatomical place.
Anthropologists had suspected that the Burtele foot belonged to A. deyiremeda for years: In 2015 they reported the species’ existence within the area based mostly on jawbones that have been 3.5 million to three.3 million years previous. However to conclusively hyperlink A. deyiremeda to the Burtele foot, the workforce wanted to return to its discovery website to search out extra fossils.
“We’ve been going to the positioning yearly for 20 years now, and the Burtele locality is revisited yearly like each locality on the website,” says Arizona State College paleobiologist and research co-author Yohannes Haile-Selassie.
Throughout the latest go to to Ethiopia’s paleoanthropological website Woranso-Mille, the workforce made a number of pivotal discoveries: fragments of pelvic bones and, crucially, a cranium and a jawbone with 12 enamel. Recognized as belonging to A. deyiremeda based mostly on the form of the canines and molars, the jaw confirmed extra primitive options than its A. afarensis cousins.
After analyzing the enamel, the workforce discovered that their proprietor ate a distinct weight loss program to Lucy, preferring to eat timber, shrubs, fruits and leaves—a weight loss program extra much like extra historical hominins, in response to the workforce. In contrast, Lucy’s species usually ate vegetation from blended woodland areas and grassland crops.
The Burtele foot offers clues to how A. deyiremeda managed to deftly climb timber for sustenance: its lengthy, curved toes and versatile bones recommend a foot nicely tailored for scaling and holding on to timber. Even the bones of the large toe are slender and curved, suggesting it might wrap round branches.
By combining their finds—the enamel, the dietary evaluation and the foot—and bearing in mind the absence of different hominin fossils on the website, the scientists have concluded that the mysterious Burtele foot belonged to A. deyiremeda.
The discovering offers researchers extra alternative to find out about how historical people tailored to stroll upright, Haile-Selassie says. And, he says, it exhibits that not all human ancestors walked on two toes.
“It’s a distinctive mode of locomotion that underwent numerous experiments all through human evolution till the emergence of Homo,” he says.
It might additionally assist settle one other debate as soon as and for all: the 2015 discovery of A. deyiremeda was contested, with some scientists arguing the specimens truly belonged to A. afarensis, says paleoanthropologist Donald Carl Johanson, who found Lucy in 1974.
The brand new research as a substitute means that A. deyiremeda inherited its foot traits from an ancestral species completely different from that which gave rise to Lucy’s sort, Johanson says. “Acceptance of a brand new hominin species at all times attracts criticism,” he says. “Whether or not the brand new proof will persuade a wider viewers that A. deyiremeda is a legitimate species stays to be seen.”
Understanding that one other hominin lived alongside Lucy’s species additionally challenges the concept human evolution was comparatively linear, Ward says. The brand new findings additionally pose questions on how historical hominins walked.
Haile-Selassie’s workforce will proceed returning annually to the Burtele website to be taught extra in regards to the biology and geographic distribution of A. deyiremeda. “There are a lot of questions that we will ask about this species,” Haile-Selassie says.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
For those who loved this text, I’d prefer to ask in your help. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and business for 180 years, and proper now often is the most crucial second in that two-century historical past.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I used to be 12 years previous, and it helped form the best way I have a look at the world. SciAm at all times educates and delights me, and conjures up a way of awe for our huge, lovely universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
For those who subscribe to Scientific American, you assist be certain that our protection is centered on significant analysis and discovery; that we’ve got the sources to report on the choices that threaten labs throughout the U.S.; and that we help each budding and dealing scientists at a time when the worth of science itself too typically goes unrecognized.
In return, you get important information, charming podcasts, good infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch movies, difficult video games, and the science world’s greatest writing and reporting. You may even reward somebody a subscription.
There has by no means been a extra vital time for us to face up and present why science issues. I hope you’ll help us in that mission.
[ad_2]

